What is an Initial Dex Offering (IDO)?

Maciej Zieliński

15 Mar 2022
What is an Initial Dex Offering (IDO)?

The development of the cryptocurrency industry and IDO is progressing every year. Thanks to this, new ways of raising funds appear frequently. Initial Dex Offering is one such form. This is one of several ways to raise funds for crypto projects. It is worth noting that the first approach to raising funds for a project's token was the Initial Coin Offering (ICO), which in 2017 brought many advantages and negatives. At the same time, ICO has led to the fact that many investors have become millioners within a few days. How does ICO compare to IDO? Why can IDO be a more interesting concept for raising funds? We are writing about this in thie article below!

ICO and IDO

As we have written earlier, ICO is an unregulated approach to crowdsourcing funds from retail investors. In the crypto space, the main challenges of initial coin offering were related to lack of control and protection of investors' funds. Cryptocurrency projects access was based on complete trust. ICO creators were not due diligence tested. This has led to a time when almost every initial coin offering project could promise significant profits - but these promises have repeatedly proved to be empty.

ICO vs IDO

Many ICO projects have simply proved to be a fraud. Decentralized finance (DeFi) can help with this, as they aim to address this problem through alternative fund-raising models. One such model is the decentralized Exchange (DEX) model. DEX offers cryptocurrency investors access to another, more egalitarian model of crowdfunding in the crypto market.

What is a DEX offer or IDO?

It is worth noting that the original concept of the initial offers of DEX has changed enormously over the years and in its current most popular form has little to do with what it planned to implement at the start of the initial IDO (Initial DEX Offering). In fact, the initial offer of DEX is the successor to initial coin offering and IEO, because its goal is to collect money and launch the project. However, unlike ICO and IEO, in which tokens are sold before being listed, in the case of initial dex offering, they are immediately listed on a decentralized exchanges. For this reason, the name DEX was created.

DEX

What is the Raven Protocol? The first ever Initial DEX Offerings took place in June 2019 – it was called the Raven Protocol. The protocol team selected the decentralized Binance DEX exchange. They place a new token at a specific price, and the traders could buy it until the hard cap has been reached on binance dex. 

In theory, this particular way of fundraising had several powerful benefits, including:

  • Quick Trading
  • Immediate liquidity was achieved
  • An open and transparent means pf collecting money has been achieved

However, investors were not satisfied. The reason was that these symbolic sales would be sold out in a few seconds, leaving a small opportunity for the average investor to participate in the project. As a result of the immediate selling of the entire offer, there was speculation that it was done by bots. This is how the first initial dex offering start platforms, which are gaining popularity today, were formed.

What is a starting offer for DEX and IEO (Initial Exchange Offerings)

The first offer of DEX (IDO) is a way to raise funds that receives investment capital from retail investors. IDO was created to address the shortcomings of the 'traditional' model of cryptocurrency community funding, the initial coin offering. Given that IDO works with DEX, unlike centralized exchange, DEX can be regarded as a decentralized liquidity exchange. Decentralized liquidity exchange and  initial dex offering is the latest model for funding cryptocurrency projects that want to raise funds from investors. However, let us remember that DEX is less scalable than ICO and IEO, and many trading processes are based on DeFi platforms

Token Generation EVENT and decentralized exchange

Today, in its most popular iteration and form, the initial offers of DEX are particularly similar to Initial Exchange offerings (IEO) with some key differences.

  • In the case of IEO, it was an echange which reviewed projects and conducted token sales. With initial dex offering, it is a third-party platform that checks the stock exchange, while token sales themselves take place in a slightly decentralized manner.
  • In theory, anyone can raise funds through IDO (initial dex offerings) using a third-party start platform because everything he or she would have to do is open the pool.
  • The way it works is quite simple. The project is sent to the starter, and if it meets the requirements, it is selected for the initial dex offering. The process itself may vary from one starter to another, but the concept is always the same.
  • There is a pool from which users can buy an "IOU" of the token that the project wants to run. The IOU is a confirmation of the debt. In other words, investors pay for their tokens in advance, but receive them at the Token Generation Event (TGE), which usually takes place very shortly after the IDO itself (usually within a few hours).
  • Once the IDO has been successfully concluded and TGE has started, the token is immediately traded on a decentralized exchange. In most cases, this is the case with Uniswap because the vast number of projects is still built on Ethereum and their tokens are based on the ERC20 protocol standard.

However, other blockchains are also gaining popularity, including Solana, Polkadot and Binance Smart Chain (BSC). Therefore, some projects prefer to run their tokens on them to avoid high network charges in Ethereum. In this case, the token would be listed on a native stock exchange, such as the BSC’s PancakeSwap.

How do IDO cryptocurrencies work?

IDO (initial dex offering) works because DEX can provide instant liquidity for tokens based on smart contracts. That is why DEX tends to reward liquidity pool providers with attractive rewards. Liquidity pools allow DEX to operate without unexpected problems for their users. In order to help trade, most projects provide liquidity to DEX by allocating a part of the funds. This approach has become standard practice. Many projects are also supported by the “Proof of Stake (POS) mechanism. The POS consensus is designed to keep the network secure. But in this case, the mechanism mainly serves to discourage investors from selling tokens too fast. This ensures that investors hold their token capital in their portfolio. In return, they earn rewards for their "participation" in the network. Then, when the project is launched, investors can immediately start trading the token. Investors who have purchased tokens faster can sell them at a higher price when initial dex offerings begins to operate. When the public sale starts, the token value increases.

Fees and smart contracts

In the event of an ecchange, the fees for the performance of the new smart contract are negligible, as the trading pairs provide a high degree of liquidity. Smart contracts help manage the asset token and the liquidity pool. It should be stressed that unlike traditional fund-raising models, IDO can immediately create tokens. In addition, any meaningful IDO project can be qualified to raise funds from retail investors. The same can be said about avoiding the high costs of Initial Exchange Offerings (IEO). Investors do not have to wait long for the desired tokens to appear on the stock exchange. The list usually appears immediately after the initial dex offerings is complete. This time allows investors to make money on their investments much quicker compared to initial coin offering .

Pros and cons of IDO

Like any funding method, IDO has its advantages and disadvantages for project's token, which we have decided to present below:

Pros of IDO

  • Availability - IDO has no procedures that can be associated with IEO. As a result, many people can raise capital without unnecessary bureaucracy.
  • Speed - investors are quickly informed of the arrival of tokens on the stock exchanges and start trading because they have immediate access  to trade. The listing occurs almost immediately after the IDO has ended. Its good for token projects. 
  • Immediate liquidity - in connection with the promotion of PoS, significant capital is leftavailable on the stock exchange, thus improving its liquidity.
  • Transparency - anyone can review token contracts and projects beforehand.

Cons of IDO

  • Verification - the low level of verification leads to many rogue creators who attempt to defraud funds.
  • Competition - it is extremely difficult to participate in IDO because of a huge number of competitors who wish to purchase tokens.
  • Token sharing - most tokens in IDO generally reach the team and private investors first, and afterwards to the rest of the entities.
  • However, IDO still seems to be an attractive form of investment, with little bureaucracy and tempting, significant profits.

Crypto projects offered by IDO are lightning-fast. The initial waiting period for selling tokens at the exchange is short, which allows many people to profit quickly. Unfortunately, these offers are often attractive and, as a result, an average crypto trader may not be able to make the purchase in time, as you will see if do your own research into the matter. Moreover, IDO are not usually present on centralized exchanges, which means that they are also directed towards a smaller group of people. However, IDO is attractive due to the lack of bureaucracy, quick access to funds and the immediate provision of liquidity to the platform.

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

What is Berachain? 🐻 ⛓️ + Proof-of-Liquidity Explained

Karolina

18 Mar 2024
What is Berachain? 🐻 ⛓️ + Proof-of-Liquidity Explained

Enter Berachain: a high-performance, EVM-compatible blockchain that is set to redefine the landscape of decentralized applications (dApps) and blockchain services. Built on the innovative Proof-of-Liquidity consensus and leveraging the robust Polaris framework alongside the CometBFT consensus engine, Berachain is poised to offer an unprecedented blend of efficiency, security, and user-centric benefits. Let's dive into what makes it a groundbreaking development in the blockchain ecosystem.

What is Berachain?

Overview

Berachain is an EVM-compatible Layer 1 (L1) blockchain that stands out through its adoption of the Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) consensus mechanism. Designed to address the critical challenges faced by decentralized networks. It introduces a cutting-edge approach to blockchain governance and operations.

Key Features

  • High-performance Capabilities. Berachain is engineered for speed and scalability, catering to the growing demand for efficient blockchain solutions.
  • EVM Compatibility. It supports all Ethereum tooling, operations, and smart contract languages, making it a seamless transition for developers and projects from the Ethereum ecosystem.
  • Proof-of-Liquidity.This novel consensus mechanism focuses on building liquidity, decentralizing stake, and aligning the interests of validators and protocol developers.

MUST READ: Docs

EVM-Compatible vs EVM-Equivalent

EVM-Compatible

EVM compatibility means a blockchain can interact with Ethereum's ecosystem to some extent. It can interact supporting its smart contracts and tools but not replicating the entire EVM environment.

EVM-Equivalent

An EVM-equivalent blockchain, on the other hand, aims to fully replicate Ethereum's environment. It ensures complete compatibility and a smooth transition for developers and users alike.

Berachain's Position

Berachain can be considered an "EVM-equivalent-plus" blockchain. It supports all Ethereum operations, tooling, and additional functionalities that optimize for its unique Proof-of-Liquidity and abstracted use cases.

Berachain Modular First Approach

At the heart of Berachain's development philosophy is the Polaris EVM framework. It's a testament to the blockchain's commitment to modularity and flexibility. This approach allows for the easy separation of the EVM runtime layer, ensuring that Berachain can adapt and evolve without compromising on performance or security.

Proof Of Liquidity Overview

High-Level Model Objectives

  • Systemically Build Liquidity. By enhancing trading efficiency, price stability, and network growth, Berachain aims to foster a thriving ecosystem of decentralized applications.
  • Solve Stake Centralization. The PoL consensus works to distribute stake more evenly across the network, preventing monopolization and ensuring a decentralized, secure blockchain.
  • Align Protocols and Validators. Berachain encourages a symbiotic relationship between validators and the broader protocol ecosystem.

Proof-of-Liquidity vs Proof-of-Stake

Unlike traditional Proof of Stake (PoS), which often leads to stake centralization and reduced liquidity, Proof of Liquidity (PoL) introduces mechanisms to incentivize liquidity provision and ensure a fairer, more decentralized network. Berachain separates the governance token (BGT) from the chain's gas token (BERA) and incentives liquidity through BEX pools. Berachain's PoL aims to overcome the limitations of PoS, fostering a more secure and user-centric blockchain.

Berachain EVM and Modular Approach

Polaris EVM

Polaris EVM is the cornerstone of Berachain's EVM compatibility, offering developers an enhanced environment for smart contract execution that includes stateful precompiles and custom modules. This framework ensures that Berachain not only meets but exceeds the capabilities of the traditional Ethereum Virtual Machine.

CometBFT

The CometBFT consensus engine underpins Berachain's network, providing a secure and efficient mechanism for transaction verification and block production. By leveraging the principles of Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT), CometBFT ensures the integrity and resilience of the Berachain blockchain.

Conclusion

Berachain represents a significant leap forward in blockchain technology, combining the best of Ethereum's ecosystem with innovative consensus mechanisms and a modular development approach. As the blockchain landscape continues to evolve, Berachain stands out as a promising platform for developers, users, and validators alike, offering a scalable, efficient, and inclusive environment for decentralized applications and services.

Resources

For those interested in exploring further, a wealth of resources is available, including the Berachain documentation, GitHub repository, and community forums. It offers a compelling vision for the future of blockchain technology, marked by efficiency, security, and community-driven innovation.

FAQ

How is Berachain different?

  • It integrates Proof-of-Liquidity to address stake centralization and enhance liquidity, setting it apart from other blockchains.

Is Berachain EVM-compatible?

  • Yes, it supports Ethereum's tooling and smart contract languages, facilitating easy migration of dApps.

Can it handle high transaction volumes?

  • Yes, thanks to the Polaris framework and CometBFT consensus engine, it's built for scalability and high throughput.

Different Token Release Schedules

Kajetan Olas

15 Mar 2024
Different Token Release Schedules

As simple as it may sound, the decision on the release schedule of tokens is anything but that. It's a strategic choice that can have significant consequences. A well-thought-out token release schedule can prevent market flooding, encourage steady growth, and foster trust in the project. Conversely, a poorly designed schedule may lead to rapid devaluation or loss of investor confidence.

In this article, we will explore the various token release schedules that blockchain projects may adopt. Each type comes with its own set of characteristics, challenges, and strategic benefits. From the straightforwardness of linear schedules to the incentive-driven dynamic releases, understanding these mechanisms is crucial for all crypto founders.

Linear Token Release Schedule

The linear token release schedule is perhaps the most straightforward approach to token distribution. As the name suggests, tokens are released at a constant rate over a specified period until all tokens are fully vested. This approach is favored for its simplicity and ease of understanding, which can be an attractive feature for investors and project teams alike.

Characteristics

  • Predictability: The linear model provides a clear and predictable schedule that stakeholders can rely on. This transparency is often appreciated as it removes any uncertainty regarding when tokens will be available.
  • Implementation Simplicity: With no complex rules or conditions, a linear release schedule is relatively easy to implement and manage. It avoids the need for intricate smart contract programming or ongoing adjustments.
  • Neutral Incentives: There is no explicit incentive for early investment or late participation. Each stakeholder is treated equally, regardless of when they enter the project. This can be perceived as a fair distribution method, as it does not disproportionately reward any particular group.

Implications

  • Capital Dilution Risk: Since tokens are released continuously at the same rate, there's a potential risk that the influx of new tokens into the market could dilute the value, particularly if demand doesn't keep pace with the supply.
  • Attracting Continuous Capital Inflow: A linear schedule may face challenges in attracting new investors over time. Without the incentive of increasing rewards or scarcity over time, sustaining investor interest solely based on project performance can be a test of the project's inherent value and market demand.
  • Neutral Impact on Project Commitment: The lack of timing-based incentives means that commitment to the project may not be influenced by the release schedule. The focus is instead placed on the project's progress and delivery on its roadmap.

In summary, a linear token release schedule offers a no-frills, equal-footing approach to token distribution. While its simplicity is a strength, it can also be a limitation, lacking the strategic incentives that other models offer. In the next sections, we will compare this to other, more dynamic schedules that aim to provide additional strategic advantages.

Growing Token Release Schedule

A growing token release schedule turns the dial up on token distribution as time progresses. This schedule is designed to increase the number of tokens released to the market or to stakeholders with each passing period. This approach can often be associated with incentivizing the sustained growth of the project by rewarding long-term holders.

Characteristics

  • Incentivized Patience: A growing token release schedule encourages stakeholders to remain invested in the project for longer periods, as the reward increases over time. This can be particularly appealing to long-term investors who are looking to maximize their gains.
  • Community Reaction: Such a schedule may draw criticism from those who prefer immediate, high rewards and may be viewed as unfairly penalizing early adopters who receive fewer tokens compared to those who join later. The challenge is to balance the narrative to maintain community support.
  • Delayed Advantage: There is a delayed gratification aspect to this schedule. Early investors might not see an immediate substantial benefit, but they are part of a strategy that aims to increase value over time, aligning with the project’s growth.

Implications

  • Sustained Capital Inflow: By offering higher rewards later, a project can potentially sustain and even increase its capital inflow as the project matures. This can be especially useful in supporting long-term development and operational goals.
  • Potential for Late-Stage Interest: As the reward for holding tokens grows over time, it may attract new investors down the line, drawn by the prospect of higher yields. This can help to maintain a steady interest in the project throughout its lifecycle.
  • Balancing Perception and Reality: Managing the community's expectations is vital. The notion that early participants are at a disadvantage must be addressed through clear communication about the long-term vision and benefits.

In contrast to a linear schedule, a growing token release schedule adds a strategic twist that favors the longevity of stakeholder engagement. It's a model that can create a solid foundation for future growth but requires careful communication and management to keep stakeholders satisfied. Up next, we will look at the shrinking token release schedule, which applies an opposite approach to distribution.

Shrinking Token Release Schedule

The shrinking token release schedule is characterized by a decrease in the number of tokens released as time goes on. This type of schedule is intended to create a sense of urgency and reward early participants with higher initial payouts.

Characteristics

  • Early Bird Incentives: The shrinking schedule is crafted to reward the earliest adopters the most, offering them a larger share of tokens initially. This creates a compelling case for getting involved early in the project's lifecycle.
  • Fear of Missing Out (FOMO): This approach capitalizes on the FOMO effect, incentivizing potential investors to buy in early to maximize their rewards before the release rate decreases.
  • Decreased Inflation Over Time: As fewer tokens are released into circulation later on, the potential inflationary pressure on the token's value is reduced. This can be an attractive feature for investors concerned about long-term value erosion.

Implications

  • Stimulating Early Adoption: By offering more tokens earlier, projects may see a surge in initial capital inflow, providing the necessary funds to kickstart development and fuel early-stage growth.
  • Risk of Decreased Late-Stage Incentives: As the reward diminishes over time, there's a risk that new investors may be less inclined to participate, potentially impacting the project's ability to attract capital in its later stages.
  • Market Perception and Price Dynamics: The market must understand that the shrinking release rate is a deliberate strategy to encourage early investment and sustain the token's value over time. However, this can lead to challenges in maintaining interest as the release rate slows, requiring additional value propositions.

A shrinking token release schedule offers an interesting dynamic for projects seeking to capitalize on early market excitement. While it can generate significant early support, the challenge lies in maintaining momentum as the reward potential decreases. This necessitates a robust project foundation and continued delivery of milestones to retain stakeholder interest.

Dynamic Token Release Schedule

A dynamic token release schedule represents a flexible and adaptive approach to token distribution. Unlike static models, this schedule can adjust the rate of token release based on specific criteria. Example criteria are: project’s milestones, market conditions, or the behavior of token holders. This responsiveness is designed to offer a balanced strategy that can react to the project's needs in real-time.

Characteristics

  • Adaptability: The most significant advantage of a dynamic schedule is its ability to adapt to changing circumstances. This can include varying the release rate to match market demand, project development stages, or other critical factors.
  • Risk Management: By adjusting the flow of tokens in response to market conditions, a dynamic schedule can help mitigate certain risks. For example: inflation, token price volatility, and the impact of market manipulation.
  • Stakeholder Alignment: This schedule can be structured to align incentives with the project's goals. This means rewarding behaviors that contribute to project's longevity, such as holding tokens for certain periods or participating in governance.

Implications

  • Balancing Supply and Demand: A dynamic token release can fine-tune the supply to match demand, aiming to stabilize the token price. This can be particularly effective in avoiding the boom-and-bust cycles that plague many cryptocurrency projects.
  • Investor Engagement: The flexibility of a dynamic schedule keeps investors engaged, as the potential for reward can change in line with project milestones and success markers, maintaining a sense of involvement and investment in the project’s progression.
  • Complexity and Communication: The intricate nature of a dynamic schedule requires clear and transparent communication with stakeholders to ensure understanding of the system. The complexity also demands robust technical implementation to execute the varying release strategies effectively.

Dynamic token release schedule is a sophisticated tool that, when used judiciously, offers great flexibility in navigating unpredictable crypto markets. It requires a careful balance of anticipation, reaction, and communication but also gives opportunity to foster project’s growth.

Conclusion

A linear token release schedule is the epitome of simplicity and fairness, offering a steady and predictable path. The growing schedule promotes long-term investment and project loyalty, potentially leading to sustained growth. In contrast, the shrinking schedule seeks to capitalize on the enthusiasm of early adopters, fostering a vibrant initial ecosystem. Lastly, the dynamic schedule stands out for its intelligent adaptability, aiming to strike a balance between various stakeholder interests and market forces.

The choice of token release schedule should not be made in isolation; it must consider the project's goals, the nature of its community, the volatility of the market, and the overarching vision of the creators.

FAQ

What are the different token release schedules?

  • Linear, growing, shrinking, and dynamic schedules.

How does a linear token release schedule work?

  • Releases tokens at a constant rate over a specified period.

What is the goal of a shrinking token release schedule?

  • Rewards early adopters with more tokens and decreases over time.