Play-to-earn brings much-needed change to the gaming industry

Maciej Zieliński

29 Dec 2021
Play-to-earn brings much-needed change to the gaming industry

Play-to-earn may be the hottest word in the whole gaming industry. Check how you can join the trend that rocks players all around the globe!

Earing by playing games isn’t necessarily a new idea. Even 20 years ago best players of such games as Diablo II or Runescape were able to make money on selling digital assets they acquired during the game. Not to mention the professional players, who in the last decade became able to generate significant profits from their e-sport activity. 

Yet, through time many new restrictions emerged, making earning from playing more and more difficult for amateur players. Of course, solutions such as Steam marketplace are available. Yet, they are not free from burdensome limitations. For example, on Steam it’s not possible to withdraw money from your account. Other ways of trading in-game assets, which involved less popular or not adapted platforms, often fail when it comes to security. 

NFTs may give us a chance to change it. And everything indicates that players are interested. 

What does play-to-earn mean?

Essentially play-to-earn refer to earning real profits just by… playing. Simple, right? As we mentioned the core idea isn’t new. Yet, it is thanks to modern solutions such as NTF, that this phenomenon may be facilitated for the broader audience.

Currently, play-to-earn is most often used in the context of so-called crypto games. These gaming platforms allow their users to earn their native cryptocurrency during the game. For example, users can get tokens for winning fights or selling limited items. Eventually, those tokens can be exchanged for other cryptocurrencies or fiat money.

Why are investors interested in launching their own crypto games? With the growth of the game’s environment, the value of the game’s native currency increased as well. The more players game has, the more transactions are facilitated in-game, and eventually the higher demand for the currency is. 

Play-to-earn gaming and crypto games are two phenomenons highly connected with each other. Hence, to bring closer the first one, we will also discuss the second.

Crypto games

Crypto games are without a doubt the hottest trend in the Blockchain industry. Despite a modest start, crypto games slowly became one of the most revolutionizing factors in the modern gaming landscape. From CryptoKitties, through NBA Top Shot, to Axie Infinity - crypto games from simple collectible games have grown into revolutionary projects, which influence goes far beyond the gaming industry. How was it possible? All thanks to NFT tokens…

Yes, that’s right. You hear about NFT almost everywhere. Collins dictionary even named NFT the Word of the Year for 2021! But among all NFT’s implementations, one seems to be particularly exciting for blockchain entrepreneurs - games. Recent events, such as Immutable X’s ICO, show us how important this branch became for the whole industry. 

How NFTs may be used in video games? Below we briefly described that issue. 

What are NFTs?

NFTs - 2021 was definitely their year. Spectacular events, such as record-breaking art sales, incredibly expensive virtual land plots, or fashion icons launching their own NFT collections made headlines all across the globe. Here you can find more about particularly significant NFT projects from 2021. But besides a buzzword, what exactly are NFTs? 

NFT stands for non-fungible token. Non-fungibility means that every token in the system is unique. NFTs don’t have a common value and often do not allow for an equal exchange (NFT for NFT). Each token represents unique information of ownership or identity.  

Among various blockchain token types, we differentiate between fungible and non-fungible tokens. (You can read here more about token types) Examples of the first kind are Bitcoin or Ether. Fungible means that a single token is indistinguishable from others in the same ecosystem. Just like in regular currency. Thus, they can be used for payment transactions. 

Although NFT tokens became popular just recently, they’ve been with us for much longer. First, and still most popular NFT standard - ERC was created in 2016. Yet, for a long time, NFTs were left in the shadow of their fungible counterparts. This year delivered dozens of groundbreaking projects that changed this trend. 

NFT games 

NFT games are almost as old as NFTs themselves. After all their first commercial usage was a game: CryptoKitties. The game allows players to buy, collect, and sell virtual kitties, which are saved on blockchain as NFTs. Since the game’s debut in 2017, its creators - Dapper Labbs made over $40 million on it. 

CryptoKitties were the first game of this kind which started a whole new trend. Yet, the recent projects enabled us to unlock the true potential of NFT, which goes far beyond simple collectibles.

NFT and gaming assets 

Everywhere where users collect and trade virtual gaming assets, NFTs can highly improve their gaming experience. Essentially, they assure players about the authenticity and scarcity of gaming assets and allow them to keep full ownership of the purchased assets. 

As an example, let’s take multiplayer games like the aforementioned LOL or Fortnite. Possessed skins and champions are of great importance to the players. What if the players had complete control over the ownership rights to their game assets?

Play-to-earn gaming

Ok, all of that sounds tremendous. But what the whole industry is talking about are play-to-earn possibilities that NFTs bring. As creators of one of the top NFT games - God’s Unchained, say: “You don’t own assets if you can’t sell them”. This is the main idea behind the majority of NFT games right now. Their game itself is one of the projects that aim to enable players to earn on in-game assets saved as NFT. But how exactly do NFTs facilitate play-to-earn?

Let’s imagine an online card game where users unclocked new characters and equipment by participating in a quest and winning fights. What if they would like to sell their character? Many games of this type actually allowed players to do so. Yet, often it’s only possible in exchange for the game’s coins which don’t represent any real value. Furthermore, such coins are usually characterized by the same problem as any other in-game assets - players don’t possess any ownership rights to them.

As we mentioned before, NFTs are unique digital assets that represent encoded information about their identity and ownership. There is a thing with blockchain: changing such data requires consensus reached among every node. In practice, it means that NFTs can be considered as authenticity and ownership certificates of themselves. Moreover, every action involving NFT is extremely treatable and secured against fraud. 

Therefore, saving in-game assets as NFTs allowed players to possess ownership rights to them. Such assets can be traded on both internal and external marketplace. Sometimes for fiat currencies or popular cryptocurrencies, sometimes for the game’s native tokens, which then can be eventually exchanged for “real money”. This is how NFT may unlock true play-to-earn possibilities in numerous types of games. We listed just a few of them: 

Games’ native tokens are another phenomenon that deserves our attention. In contrast to the usual game’s coins, those tokens can be listed on external exchanges, and represent particular value even outside the game. Why? In case of their case, fungible tokens are used. Therefore, essentially we can speak about game-specific cryptocurrencies. What’s important for games’ creators, those tokens gain value, with the game ecosystem’s growth. 

Scarcity is nothing new for the gaming industry. Unique skins, armors, and other digital assets are commonly present in it almost from the begging. Through the years different markets have been created to facilitate users’ trade. Yet, there were always limitations. For example, usually direct exchanges to “real money” were impossible. NFT may change that for good. 

As we mentioned, gamming assets saved as NFT can be traded on both internal and external marketplace. The same goes to games’ native currencies. What’s important, this trade can be decentralized. 

It needs to be noted that behind video games stands an industry worth over $330 billion. Play-to-earn gaming my by a way to share part of this spectacular growth with players. 

The new generation of embed finance?

Although paying a real-life rant fee in game’s coins may sound absurd, it already happens. Axie Infinity is a blockchain game that enables players to earn native tokens by winning fights and selling avatars. Eventually, those tokens can be exchanged for other cryptocurrencies or fiat money on external exchanges. Therefore, without a doubt we can speak about the truly play-to-earn game.

Yet, what’s unique about Axis is the unpredicted implementation of the game’s native tokens that emerged in the Philippines, where the game has 40 % of its players. According to Sky Mavis for 25% of Axie's players, the game's wallet is the first financial service they’ve been able to access. Arianna Simpson, a partner at Andreessen Horowitz - one of Axie's main investors, claims that in some places in the Philippines people are even paying their rent with the game’s tokens.  

Most popular play-to-earn games

Play-to-earn games: Axie Infinity
Play-to-earn games: Axie Infinity

Axie Infinity

The public heard about Axie Infinity for the first time after the spectacular sale of a digital land plot. In February 2021, user Flying Falcon bought eight genesis plots worth approximately $1.5mln. This event may be considered a milestone for the NFT market. But what is so special about Axie Infinity?

Axie resembles Pokemon, but on a Blockchain. The core of the game is combat between cartoon characters - Axies. What differentiates Axies from Pokemons is the fact that they are NFTs stored on the game’s Blockchain. Essentially they are NFTs-based digital creatures.

To create new characters, players “breed” them using the game’s native token, which can be earned through the game or bought from an exchange. By selling Axies or winning fights, players earned the currencies. Then they can sell them on the open market, making a profit.

Currently, dedicated players earn as much as thousands of dollars a month playing Axie Infinity. 

Play-to-earn games: God's Unchained
Play-to-earn games: God's Unchained

God’s Unchained 

If you are up to date with the ICOs’ world, without a doubt, you’ve heard about Immutable X. Get to know the blockchain game created by its godfathers.

Gods Unchained is a trading card game that aims to give its players complete ownership over in-game items by using NFTs. Essentially its players collect digital playing card NFTs

Their motto is, “If you can’t sell your items, you don’t own them.” Thus the game allows users to sell their cards and other items for native GODS tokens, which can be exchanged for fiat money. 

It’s worth noting that God’s Unchained remains a free-to-play game. Cards can be unlocked simply by playing the game. Therefore Gods Unchained should be considered one of the truly play-to-earn games, which stands contrary to the standard model of gaming commerce.

Play-to-earn games: The Sandbox
Play-to-earn games: The Sandbox

The Sandbox

The Sandbox is one of the NFT-based games that created their own metaverses. To date, it is one of the most popular NFT games for creating and trading in-game assets.

Like Minecraft or Roblox, this NFT game is voxel-based and offers an excellent opportunity to free users’ creativity. The Sandbox provides them with tools for creating and animating NFT objects that can be used in-game or sold on designed markets. But that’s not all - on the platform, users can also develop and play their games. Since users are able to make real money on their creations, The Sandbox is another example of play to earn the game.

Does play-to-earn gamming predicts how metaverse will look like

It’s no secret that many NFT games describe themselves as blockchain-based metaverses. Just take Sandbox as an example. According to many similar models of transection that we can observe in NFT games will be also present in metaverses. Without a doubt, there are significant factors that make them suitable for that purpose. 

Business model for play-to-earn game
The business model for play-to-earn game

Implementing play-to-earn model

If you consider launching your own NFT game that will facilitate a play-to-earn model, you should be aware that its success requires skills and knowledge regarding both the technical and business sides of the Blockchain industry. That’s why many projects decide to hire an external blockchain company as a technological partner.

At Nextrope, we can call ourselves pioneers of Blockchain technology in CEE. We conducted one of the first tokenization in the world and since that we keep up to date with the industry. NFT games aren’t an exception. 

Do you want to know how Nextrope’s team can boost your NFT game on a new level? Feel free to contact our specialists who will gladly answer all your questions.

Tagi

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

What is Berachain? 🐻 ⛓️ + Proof-of-Liquidity Explained

Karolina

18 Mar 2024
What is Berachain? 🐻 ⛓️ + Proof-of-Liquidity Explained

Enter Berachain: a high-performance, EVM-compatible blockchain that is set to redefine the landscape of decentralized applications (dApps) and blockchain services. Built on the innovative Proof-of-Liquidity consensus and leveraging the robust Polaris framework alongside the CometBFT consensus engine, Berachain is poised to offer an unprecedented blend of efficiency, security, and user-centric benefits. Let's dive into what makes it a groundbreaking development in the blockchain ecosystem.

What is Berachain?

Overview

Berachain is an EVM-compatible Layer 1 (L1) blockchain that stands out through its adoption of the Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) consensus mechanism. Designed to address the critical challenges faced by decentralized networks. It introduces a cutting-edge approach to blockchain governance and operations.

Key Features

  • High-performance Capabilities. Berachain is engineered for speed and scalability, catering to the growing demand for efficient blockchain solutions.
  • EVM Compatibility. It supports all Ethereum tooling, operations, and smart contract languages, making it a seamless transition for developers and projects from the Ethereum ecosystem.
  • Proof-of-Liquidity.This novel consensus mechanism focuses on building liquidity, decentralizing stake, and aligning the interests of validators and protocol developers.

MUST READ: Docs

EVM-Compatible vs EVM-Equivalent

EVM-Compatible

EVM compatibility means a blockchain can interact with Ethereum's ecosystem to some extent. It can interact supporting its smart contracts and tools but not replicating the entire EVM environment.

EVM-Equivalent

An EVM-equivalent blockchain, on the other hand, aims to fully replicate Ethereum's environment. It ensures complete compatibility and a smooth transition for developers and users alike.

Berachain's Position

Berachain can be considered an "EVM-equivalent-plus" blockchain. It supports all Ethereum operations, tooling, and additional functionalities that optimize for its unique Proof-of-Liquidity and abstracted use cases.

Berachain Modular First Approach

At the heart of Berachain's development philosophy is the Polaris EVM framework. It's a testament to the blockchain's commitment to modularity and flexibility. This approach allows for the easy separation of the EVM runtime layer, ensuring that Berachain can adapt and evolve without compromising on performance or security.

Proof Of Liquidity Overview

High-Level Model Objectives

  • Systemically Build Liquidity. By enhancing trading efficiency, price stability, and network growth, Berachain aims to foster a thriving ecosystem of decentralized applications.
  • Solve Stake Centralization. The PoL consensus works to distribute stake more evenly across the network, preventing monopolization and ensuring a decentralized, secure blockchain.
  • Align Protocols and Validators. Berachain encourages a symbiotic relationship between validators and the broader protocol ecosystem.

Proof-of-Liquidity vs Proof-of-Stake

Unlike traditional Proof of Stake (PoS), which often leads to stake centralization and reduced liquidity, Proof of Liquidity (PoL) introduces mechanisms to incentivize liquidity provision and ensure a fairer, more decentralized network. Berachain separates the governance token (BGT) from the chain's gas token (BERA) and incentives liquidity through BEX pools. Berachain's PoL aims to overcome the limitations of PoS, fostering a more secure and user-centric blockchain.

Berachain EVM and Modular Approach

Polaris EVM

Polaris EVM is the cornerstone of Berachain's EVM compatibility, offering developers an enhanced environment for smart contract execution that includes stateful precompiles and custom modules. This framework ensures that Berachain not only meets but exceeds the capabilities of the traditional Ethereum Virtual Machine.

CometBFT

The CometBFT consensus engine underpins Berachain's network, providing a secure and efficient mechanism for transaction verification and block production. By leveraging the principles of Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT), CometBFT ensures the integrity and resilience of the Berachain blockchain.

Conclusion

Berachain represents a significant leap forward in blockchain technology, combining the best of Ethereum's ecosystem with innovative consensus mechanisms and a modular development approach. As the blockchain landscape continues to evolve, Berachain stands out as a promising platform for developers, users, and validators alike, offering a scalable, efficient, and inclusive environment for decentralized applications and services.

Resources

For those interested in exploring further, a wealth of resources is available, including the Berachain documentation, GitHub repository, and community forums. It offers a compelling vision for the future of blockchain technology, marked by efficiency, security, and community-driven innovation.

FAQ

How is Berachain different?

  • It integrates Proof-of-Liquidity to address stake centralization and enhance liquidity, setting it apart from other blockchains.

Is Berachain EVM-compatible?

  • Yes, it supports Ethereum's tooling and smart contract languages, facilitating easy migration of dApps.

Can it handle high transaction volumes?

  • Yes, thanks to the Polaris framework and CometBFT consensus engine, it's built for scalability and high throughput.

Different Token Release Schedules

Kajetan Olas

15 Mar 2024
Different Token Release Schedules

As simple as it may sound, the decision on the release schedule of tokens is anything but that. It's a strategic choice that can have significant consequences. A well-thought-out token release schedule can prevent market flooding, encourage steady growth, and foster trust in the project. Conversely, a poorly designed schedule may lead to rapid devaluation or loss of investor confidence.

In this article, we will explore the various token release schedules that blockchain projects may adopt. Each type comes with its own set of characteristics, challenges, and strategic benefits. From the straightforwardness of linear schedules to the incentive-driven dynamic releases, understanding these mechanisms is crucial for all crypto founders.

Linear Token Release Schedule

The linear token release schedule is perhaps the most straightforward approach to token distribution. As the name suggests, tokens are released at a constant rate over a specified period until all tokens are fully vested. This approach is favored for its simplicity and ease of understanding, which can be an attractive feature for investors and project teams alike.

Characteristics

  • Predictability: The linear model provides a clear and predictable schedule that stakeholders can rely on. This transparency is often appreciated as it removes any uncertainty regarding when tokens will be available.
  • Implementation Simplicity: With no complex rules or conditions, a linear release schedule is relatively easy to implement and manage. It avoids the need for intricate smart contract programming or ongoing adjustments.
  • Neutral Incentives: There is no explicit incentive for early investment or late participation. Each stakeholder is treated equally, regardless of when they enter the project. This can be perceived as a fair distribution method, as it does not disproportionately reward any particular group.

Implications

  • Capital Dilution Risk: Since tokens are released continuously at the same rate, there's a potential risk that the influx of new tokens into the market could dilute the value, particularly if demand doesn't keep pace with the supply.
  • Attracting Continuous Capital Inflow: A linear schedule may face challenges in attracting new investors over time. Without the incentive of increasing rewards or scarcity over time, sustaining investor interest solely based on project performance can be a test of the project's inherent value and market demand.
  • Neutral Impact on Project Commitment: The lack of timing-based incentives means that commitment to the project may not be influenced by the release schedule. The focus is instead placed on the project's progress and delivery on its roadmap.

In summary, a linear token release schedule offers a no-frills, equal-footing approach to token distribution. While its simplicity is a strength, it can also be a limitation, lacking the strategic incentives that other models offer. In the next sections, we will compare this to other, more dynamic schedules that aim to provide additional strategic advantages.

Growing Token Release Schedule

A growing token release schedule turns the dial up on token distribution as time progresses. This schedule is designed to increase the number of tokens released to the market or to stakeholders with each passing period. This approach can often be associated with incentivizing the sustained growth of the project by rewarding long-term holders.

Characteristics

  • Incentivized Patience: A growing token release schedule encourages stakeholders to remain invested in the project for longer periods, as the reward increases over time. This can be particularly appealing to long-term investors who are looking to maximize their gains.
  • Community Reaction: Such a schedule may draw criticism from those who prefer immediate, high rewards and may be viewed as unfairly penalizing early adopters who receive fewer tokens compared to those who join later. The challenge is to balance the narrative to maintain community support.
  • Delayed Advantage: There is a delayed gratification aspect to this schedule. Early investors might not see an immediate substantial benefit, but they are part of a strategy that aims to increase value over time, aligning with the project’s growth.

Implications

  • Sustained Capital Inflow: By offering higher rewards later, a project can potentially sustain and even increase its capital inflow as the project matures. This can be especially useful in supporting long-term development and operational goals.
  • Potential for Late-Stage Interest: As the reward for holding tokens grows over time, it may attract new investors down the line, drawn by the prospect of higher yields. This can help to maintain a steady interest in the project throughout its lifecycle.
  • Balancing Perception and Reality: Managing the community's expectations is vital. The notion that early participants are at a disadvantage must be addressed through clear communication about the long-term vision and benefits.

In contrast to a linear schedule, a growing token release schedule adds a strategic twist that favors the longevity of stakeholder engagement. It's a model that can create a solid foundation for future growth but requires careful communication and management to keep stakeholders satisfied. Up next, we will look at the shrinking token release schedule, which applies an opposite approach to distribution.

Shrinking Token Release Schedule

The shrinking token release schedule is characterized by a decrease in the number of tokens released as time goes on. This type of schedule is intended to create a sense of urgency and reward early participants with higher initial payouts.

Characteristics

  • Early Bird Incentives: The shrinking schedule is crafted to reward the earliest adopters the most, offering them a larger share of tokens initially. This creates a compelling case for getting involved early in the project's lifecycle.
  • Fear of Missing Out (FOMO): This approach capitalizes on the FOMO effect, incentivizing potential investors to buy in early to maximize their rewards before the release rate decreases.
  • Decreased Inflation Over Time: As fewer tokens are released into circulation later on, the potential inflationary pressure on the token's value is reduced. This can be an attractive feature for investors concerned about long-term value erosion.

Implications

  • Stimulating Early Adoption: By offering more tokens earlier, projects may see a surge in initial capital inflow, providing the necessary funds to kickstart development and fuel early-stage growth.
  • Risk of Decreased Late-Stage Incentives: As the reward diminishes over time, there's a risk that new investors may be less inclined to participate, potentially impacting the project's ability to attract capital in its later stages.
  • Market Perception and Price Dynamics: The market must understand that the shrinking release rate is a deliberate strategy to encourage early investment and sustain the token's value over time. However, this can lead to challenges in maintaining interest as the release rate slows, requiring additional value propositions.

A shrinking token release schedule offers an interesting dynamic for projects seeking to capitalize on early market excitement. While it can generate significant early support, the challenge lies in maintaining momentum as the reward potential decreases. This necessitates a robust project foundation and continued delivery of milestones to retain stakeholder interest.

Dynamic Token Release Schedule

A dynamic token release schedule represents a flexible and adaptive approach to token distribution. Unlike static models, this schedule can adjust the rate of token release based on specific criteria. Example criteria are: project’s milestones, market conditions, or the behavior of token holders. This responsiveness is designed to offer a balanced strategy that can react to the project's needs in real-time.

Characteristics

  • Adaptability: The most significant advantage of a dynamic schedule is its ability to adapt to changing circumstances. This can include varying the release rate to match market demand, project development stages, or other critical factors.
  • Risk Management: By adjusting the flow of tokens in response to market conditions, a dynamic schedule can help mitigate certain risks. For example: inflation, token price volatility, and the impact of market manipulation.
  • Stakeholder Alignment: This schedule can be structured to align incentives with the project's goals. This means rewarding behaviors that contribute to project's longevity, such as holding tokens for certain periods or participating in governance.

Implications

  • Balancing Supply and Demand: A dynamic token release can fine-tune the supply to match demand, aiming to stabilize the token price. This can be particularly effective in avoiding the boom-and-bust cycles that plague many cryptocurrency projects.
  • Investor Engagement: The flexibility of a dynamic schedule keeps investors engaged, as the potential for reward can change in line with project milestones and success markers, maintaining a sense of involvement and investment in the project’s progression.
  • Complexity and Communication: The intricate nature of a dynamic schedule requires clear and transparent communication with stakeholders to ensure understanding of the system. The complexity also demands robust technical implementation to execute the varying release strategies effectively.

Dynamic token release schedule is a sophisticated tool that, when used judiciously, offers great flexibility in navigating unpredictable crypto markets. It requires a careful balance of anticipation, reaction, and communication but also gives opportunity to foster project’s growth.

Conclusion

A linear token release schedule is the epitome of simplicity and fairness, offering a steady and predictable path. The growing schedule promotes long-term investment and project loyalty, potentially leading to sustained growth. In contrast, the shrinking schedule seeks to capitalize on the enthusiasm of early adopters, fostering a vibrant initial ecosystem. Lastly, the dynamic schedule stands out for its intelligent adaptability, aiming to strike a balance between various stakeholder interests and market forces.

The choice of token release schedule should not be made in isolation; it must consider the project's goals, the nature of its community, the volatility of the market, and the overarching vision of the creators.

FAQ

What are the different token release schedules?

  • Linear, growing, shrinking, and dynamic schedules.

How does a linear token release schedule work?

  • Releases tokens at a constant rate over a specified period.

What is the goal of a shrinking token release schedule?

  • Rewards early adopters with more tokens and decreases over time.