New Wave of Eco-Blockchains – why it matters and how you can act

Maciej Zieliński

07 Feb 2022
New Wave of Eco-Blockchains – why it matters and how you can act

The Blockchain community starts to notice the environmental impact of cryptocurrencies and distributed ledger technologies (DLT). Now, there is a new class of projects which combine sustainability and environment with decentralization, which augments their business utility. In this article, we explore the new wave of eco-blockchains, and why you should get on board quickly.

Table of contents:

  • The carbon footprint of blockchain protocols
  • Why validating nodes is so energy-intensive
  • Proof of Work alternatives
  • Eco-friendly blockchains
  • How to lower the energy consumption of alternative finance
  • Blockchain and carbon neutrality

Though undoubtedly successful and enormously powerful, early Blockchain protocols such as the one of Bitcoin, have suffered from limitations to their scalability and sustainability. Because of their consensus mechanism in encrypting new blocks and adding them to the transaction ledger.

So far, the main race in blockchain technology has revolved around combating high transaction fees, boosting algorithm efficiency, and improving the speed of crypto transactions. Those factors have had a clear impact on crypto prices. 

Electricity consumption and carbon footprint

With the growth in the number of users and transactions, Blockchain systems based on the Proof-of-Work (PoW) mechanism require an increased computing power for miners. That causes increasingly-advanced computations to consume more energy as the network size grows. In turn, PoW-based Blockchains – such as the one of Bitcoin – have over time become environmentally unsustainable, because of their high energy consumption. Proof-of-Stake consensus model – e.g. in Ethereum – requires slightly less energy but does not eliminate the problem of limited scalability. 

Energy consumption

BTC alone represents 43% of the overall crypto traffic, which makes it the most popular cryptocurrency. The Bitcoin network has the greatest carbon footprint due to its energy consumption. According to the Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index, it’s estimated that Bitcoin mining requires 178 TWh of electrical power – roughly the same as the annual consumption of energy in Poland.  

Because of the environmental impact of mining, cryptocurrencies are criticized and compared to centralized financial tools. For example, one BTC creating a new block requires 1779 kWh of power, while 100,000 transactions operated by the payment card provider VISA, consume 189 kWh only. In one transaction, Bitcoin uses as much electricity as an average American household in 67 days. 

Eco blockchains - more sustainable future

Taking into account all the environmental considerations, the new generation of sustainable Blockchains has emerged in response to skyrocketing consumption of miners in conventional cryptocurrencies. Apart from ethical arguments, the reason for their rising popularity is scalability. With the rising prices of cryptocurrencies, miners need to process a greater volume of transactions; especially in 2021, the problem of rising electricity prices and power consumption became a pressing issue, making eco-friendly Blockchains not only an environmentally-sound proposition but also a very convincing use case in business. 

1. Chia - energy-efficient alternative

The Chia coin, powered by the Blockchain called Chia Network, skyrocketed in mid-2021 after its public mainnet launch. The Chia founder, Brian Cohen, is the author of popular software and protocol, BitTorrent. The platform was valuated at $500 million in a recent investment round. The Chia Network is currently the fastest-growing green Blockchain. It is also a smart transaction platform that allows users to take advantage of available hard drive space. Because Chia is also a smart contract platform, there is a new wave of further innovative projects released on the Chia Network that take advantage of carbon-neutral, scalable solutions of the space-based consensus mechanism. 

The Chia solution uses much less electricity compared to cryptocurrencies powered by PoW or the PoS consensus mechanism and allows more people to start mining at a lower cost. To become a Chia miner, one has to simply devote their disc space or use cloud computing platforms such as Amazon Web Services. Since Chia's launch in March 2021, Chia's computer memory usage has grown exponentially. While in mid-May 2021 it was about half a million terabytes of memory, in October this figure multiplied ten times. 

Unlike previous cryptocurrencies, the Chia coin is powered by a Blockchain using the Proof-of-Space-and-Time mechanism. As a result, Chia mining uses neither GPU nor CPU architecture to enable the exchange of data and value, but computer memory. Miners’ hard drive or SSD space powering the Chia Blockchain is connected to the decentralized network where storing a certain amount of data over a certain amount of time is rewarded in XCH, Chia’s token. 

Chia farming is accessible, with neither specialized equipment needed nor massive amounts of power. This makes it not The network’s blockchain transaction platform can be downloaded at chia.net. Users can decide to dedicate a portion of uncommitted hard drive space to the network and receive XCH in exchange, without significantly affecting computer performance or requiring vastly more energy.

2. SolarCoin 

Unlike Chia, which is a brand-new Blockchain and consensus mechanism, SolarCoin exploits the simple idea of smart contracts. It follows the logic of all other cryptocurrencies, but the key difference is that the platform design aims to incentivize real-world environmental activity: verifiably produced solar energy. The smart contract distributes 1 SolarCoin (SLR) for every MWh (megawatt hour) generated from solar panel technology. 

SolarCoin relies on two forms of Proof-of-Work (PoW) protocol. The first is the traditional cryptographic PoW associated with the most conventional cryptocurrencies (e.g. Bitcoin). The second-layer PoW is a verified mechanism that indicates whether the said 1 MWh of power was proved to be produced from solar energy. Then the smart contract distributes SolarCoins using these two PoWs as a means of rewarding green electricity generation.

3. IOTA

As a great add-on to IOTA’s tech proposition, its environmentally-oriented approach is achieved by eliminating miners, since they are the cause of environmental problems of cryptocurrencies.  IOTA uses an alternative to conventional Blockchain called the ‘Tangle’. Instead of mining, the network is maintained by smaller devices and uses calculations that require less power and thus consume less energy per transaction (0.00011 kWh per transaction), making it the most environmentally sustainable among the leading cryptocurrencies. 

The whole crypto community is getting green – so should you!

There are visible signs that the crypto developers are increasingly aware and active to find new ways of offering all the benefits of cryptocurrencies, with none of the unsustainable and environment-harming drawbacks. 

Leading Blockchain firms and corporations signed the Crypto Climate Accord. Its objective is to decarbonize the crypto industry and make it a net-zero greenhouse gas emitter by 2040. It was signed by such important names as Ripple, Consensys, Polygon – and among corporate giants: KPMG and NortonLifeLock.

Whether environmentally friendly by design or business choice, the crypto industry has very convincing arguments to ‘go green’. In the current form, the most popular cryptocurrencies like BTC have been heavily criticised for their unsustainability. Decentralization efforts cannot be sustained if the environmental costs of powering transactions keep rising. Hence, the rise of a new wave of green Blockchains and green cryptocurrencies a clear call to action for several stakeholders.

Given the early stage of development, environment-neutral cryptocurrencies and decentralized protocols are a great space for entrepreneurs to get involved. They can develop their own solutions based on sustainable Blockchains. Beyond optimizations in consensus mechanisms and DLT architectures, there are some of the most exciting business cases, such as green NFTs, exchanges and storage platforms. 

If you want to know how to build your projects based on eco-Blockchains, contact our experts who will be happy to give you a free consultation.

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Token Engineering Process

Kajetan Olas

13 Apr 2024
Token Engineering Process

Token Engineering is an emerging field that addresses the systematic design and engineering of blockchain-based tokens. It applies rigorous mathematical methods from the Complex Systems Engineering discipline to tokenomics design.

In this article, we will walk through the Token Engineering Process and break it down into three key stages. Discovery Phase, Design Phase, and Deployment Phase.

Discovery Phase of Token Engineering Process

The first stage of the token engineering process is the Discovery Phase. It focuses on constructing high-level business plans, defining objectives, and identifying problems to be solved. That phase is also the time when token engineers first define key stakeholders in the project.

Defining the Problem

This may seem counterintuitive. Why would we start with the problem when designing tokenomics? Shouldn’t we start with more down-to-earth matters like token supply? The answer is No. Tokens are a medium for creating and exchanging value within a project’s ecosystem. Since crypto projects draw their value from solving problems that can’t be solved through TradFi mechanisms, their tokenomics should reflect that. 

The industry standard, developed by McKinsey & Co. and adapted to token engineering purposes by Outlier Ventures, is structuring the problem through a logic tree, following MECE.
MECE stands for Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive. Mutually Exclusive means that problems in the tree should not overlap. Collectively Exhaustive means that the tree should cover all issues.

In practice, the “Problem” should be replaced by a whole problem statement worksheet. The same will hold for some of the boxes.
A commonly used tool for designing these kinds of diagrams is the Miro whiteboard.

Identifying Stakeholders and Value Flows in Token Engineering

This part is about identifying all relevant actors in the ecosystem and how value flows between them. To illustrate what we mean let’s consider an example of NFT marketplace. In its case, relevant actors might be sellers, buyers, NFT creators, and a marketplace owner. Possible value flow when conducting a transaction might be: buyer gets rid of his tokens, seller gets some of them, marketplace owner gets some of them as fees, and NFT creators get some of them as royalties.

Incentive Mechanisms Canvas

The last part of what we consider to be in the Discovery Phase is filling the Incentive Mechanisms Canvas. After successfully identifying value flows in the previous stage, token engineers search for frictions to desired behaviors and point out the undesired behaviors. For example, friction to activity on an NFT marketplace might be respecting royalty fees by marketplace owners since it reduces value flowing to the seller.

source: https://www.canva.com/design/DAFDTNKsIJs/8Ky9EoJJI7p98qKLIu2XNw/view#7

Design Phase of Token Engineering Process

The second stage of the Token Engineering Process is the Design Phase in which you make use of high-level descriptions from the previous step to come up with a specific design of the project. This will include everything that can be usually found in crypto whitepapers (e.g. governance mechanisms, incentive mechanisms, token supply, etc). After finishing the design, token engineers should represent the whole value flow and transactional logic on detailed visual diagrams. These diagrams will be a basis for creating mathematical models in the Deployment Phase. 

Token Engineering Artonomous Design Diagram
Artonomous design diagram, source: Artonomous GitHub

Objective Function

Every crypto project has some objective. The objective can consist of many goals, such as decentralization or token price. The objective function is a mathematical function assigning weights to different factors that influence the main objective in the order of their importance. This function will be a reference for machine learning algorithms in the next steps. They will try to find quantitative parameters (e.g. network fees) that maximize the output of this function.
Modified Metcalfe’s Law can serve as an inspiration during that step. It’s a framework for valuing crypto projects, but we believe that after adjustments it can also be used in this context.

Deployment Phase of Token Engineering Process

The Deployment Phase is final, but also the most demanding step in the process. It involves the implementation of machine learning algorithms that test our assumptions and optimize quantitative parameters. Token Engineering draws from Nassim Taleb’s concept of Antifragility and extensively uses feedback loops to make a system that gains from arising shocks.

Agent-based Modelling 

In agent-based modeling, we describe a set of behaviors and goals displayed by each agent participating in the system (this is why previous steps focused so much on describing stakeholders). Each agent is controlled by an autonomous AI and continuously optimizes his strategy. He learns from his experience and can mimic the behavior of other agents if he finds it effective (Reinforced Learning). This approach allows for mimicking real users, who adapt their strategies with time. An example adaptive agent would be a cryptocurrency trader, who changes his trading strategy in response to experiencing a loss of money.

Monte Carlo Simulations

Token Engineers use the Monte Carlo method to simulate the consequences of various possible interactions while taking into account the probability of their occurrence. By running a large number of simulations it’s possible to stress-test the project in multiple scenarios and identify emergent risks.

Testnet Deployment

If possible, it's highly beneficial for projects to extend the testing phase even further by letting real users use the network. Idea is the same as in agent-based testing - continuous optimization based on provided metrics. Furthermore, in case the project considers airdropping its tokens, giving them to early users is a great strategy. Even though part of the activity will be disingenuine and airdrop-oriented, such strategy still works better than most.

Time Duration

Token engineering process may take from as little as 2 weeks to as much as 5 months. It depends on the project category (Layer 1 protocol will require more time, than a simple DApp), and security requirements. For example, a bank issuing its digital token will have a very low risk tolerance.

Required Skills for Token Engineering

Token engineering is a multidisciplinary field and requires a great amount of specialized knowledge. Key knowledge areas are:

  • Systems Engineering
  • Machine Learning
  • Market Research
  • Capital Markets
  • Current trends in Web3
  • Blockchain Engineering
  • Statistics

Summary

The token engineering process consists of 3 steps: Discovery Phase, Design Phase, and Deployment Phase. It’s utilized mostly by established blockchain projects, and financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund. Even though it’s a very resource-consuming process, we believe it’s worth it. Projects that went through scrupulous design and testing before launch are much more likely to receive VC funding and be in the 10% of crypto projects that survive the bear market. Going through that process also has a symbolic meaning - it shows that the project is long-term oriented.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

FAQ

What does token engineering process look like?

  • Token engineering process is conducted in a 3-step methodical fashion. This includes Discovery Phase, Design Phase, and Deployment Phase. Each of these stages should be tailored to the specific needs of a project.

Is token engineering meant only for big projects?

  • We recommend that even small projects go through a simplified design and optimization process. This increases community's trust and makes sure that the tokenomics doesn't have any obvious flaws.

How long does the token engineering process take?

  • It depends on the project and may range from 2 weeks to 5 months.

What is Berachain? 🐻 ⛓️ + Proof-of-Liquidity Explained

Karolina

18 Mar 2024
What is Berachain? 🐻 ⛓️ + Proof-of-Liquidity Explained

Enter Berachain: a high-performance, EVM-compatible blockchain that is set to redefine the landscape of decentralized applications (dApps) and blockchain services. Built on the innovative Proof-of-Liquidity consensus and leveraging the robust Polaris framework alongside the CometBFT consensus engine, Berachain is poised to offer an unprecedented blend of efficiency, security, and user-centric benefits. Let's dive into what makes it a groundbreaking development in the blockchain ecosystem.

What is Berachain?

Overview

Berachain is an EVM-compatible Layer 1 (L1) blockchain that stands out through its adoption of the Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) consensus mechanism. Designed to address the critical challenges faced by decentralized networks. It introduces a cutting-edge approach to blockchain governance and operations.

Key Features

  • High-performance Capabilities. Berachain is engineered for speed and scalability, catering to the growing demand for efficient blockchain solutions.
  • EVM Compatibility. It supports all Ethereum tooling, operations, and smart contract languages, making it a seamless transition for developers and projects from the Ethereum ecosystem.
  • Proof-of-Liquidity.This novel consensus mechanism focuses on building liquidity, decentralizing stake, and aligning the interests of validators and protocol developers.

MUST READ: Docs

EVM-Compatible vs EVM-Equivalent

EVM-Compatible

EVM compatibility means a blockchain can interact with Ethereum's ecosystem to some extent. It can interact supporting its smart contracts and tools but not replicating the entire EVM environment.

EVM-Equivalent

An EVM-equivalent blockchain, on the other hand, aims to fully replicate Ethereum's environment. It ensures complete compatibility and a smooth transition for developers and users alike.

Berachain's Position

Berachain can be considered an "EVM-equivalent-plus" blockchain. It supports all Ethereum operations, tooling, and additional functionalities that optimize for its unique Proof-of-Liquidity and abstracted use cases.

Berachain Modular First Approach

At the heart of Berachain's development philosophy is the Polaris EVM framework. It's a testament to the blockchain's commitment to modularity and flexibility. This approach allows for the easy separation of the EVM runtime layer, ensuring that Berachain can adapt and evolve without compromising on performance or security.

Proof Of Liquidity Overview

High-Level Model Objectives

  • Systemically Build Liquidity. By enhancing trading efficiency, price stability, and network growth, Berachain aims to foster a thriving ecosystem of decentralized applications.
  • Solve Stake Centralization. The PoL consensus works to distribute stake more evenly across the network, preventing monopolization and ensuring a decentralized, secure blockchain.
  • Align Protocols and Validators. Berachain encourages a symbiotic relationship between validators and the broader protocol ecosystem.

Proof-of-Liquidity vs Proof-of-Stake

Unlike traditional Proof of Stake (PoS), which often leads to stake centralization and reduced liquidity, Proof of Liquidity (PoL) introduces mechanisms to incentivize liquidity provision and ensure a fairer, more decentralized network. Berachain separates the governance token (BGT) from the chain's gas token (BERA) and incentives liquidity through BEX pools. Berachain's PoL aims to overcome the limitations of PoS, fostering a more secure and user-centric blockchain.

Berachain EVM and Modular Approach

Polaris EVM

Polaris EVM is the cornerstone of Berachain's EVM compatibility, offering developers an enhanced environment for smart contract execution that includes stateful precompiles and custom modules. This framework ensures that Berachain not only meets but exceeds the capabilities of the traditional Ethereum Virtual Machine.

CometBFT

The CometBFT consensus engine underpins Berachain's network, providing a secure and efficient mechanism for transaction verification and block production. By leveraging the principles of Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT), CometBFT ensures the integrity and resilience of the Berachain blockchain.

Conclusion

Berachain represents a significant leap forward in blockchain technology, combining the best of Ethereum's ecosystem with innovative consensus mechanisms and a modular development approach. As the blockchain landscape continues to evolve, Berachain stands out as a promising platform for developers, users, and validators alike, offering a scalable, efficient, and inclusive environment for decentralized applications and services.

Resources

For those interested in exploring further, a wealth of resources is available, including the Berachain documentation, GitHub repository, and community forums. It offers a compelling vision for the future of blockchain technology, marked by efficiency, security, and community-driven innovation.

FAQ

How is Berachain different?

  • It integrates Proof-of-Liquidity to address stake centralization and enhance liquidity, setting it apart from other blockchains.

Is Berachain EVM-compatible?

  • Yes, it supports Ethereum's tooling and smart contract languages, facilitating easy migration of dApps.

Can it handle high transaction volumes?

  • Yes, thanks to the Polaris framework and CometBFT consensus engine, it's built for scalability and high throughput.