Immutable X alternatives – the best blockchain for your game

Maciej Zieliński

17 Jan 2022
Immutable X alternatives – the best blockchain for your game

Recently, launching an NTF game has become a lucrative investment option. Therefore more and more entrepreneurs seek to find reliable tools that will enable them to launch their own title. Currently, the one created by Immutable and StarkWare seems to be particularly popular. But what are the Immutable X alternatives? 

Table of Contents 

  • Polygon 
  • Immutable X
  • Solana NFT 
  • Scaling solutions for NFT
  • Gas fees 

Polygon 

Immutable X alternatives: Polygon
Immutable X alternatives: Polygon

Polygon, formerly known as the Matic network, is a secure and scalable solution, that uses side-chains of the blockchain to provide faster and cheaper transactions on Ethereum. In many ways, it resembles other Layer 2 projects such as Avalanche and Cosmos, but according to its creators, it is much more efficient and secure. The practice seems to confirm this. 

Ethereum compatible blockchain networks 

Ethereum is the most widely used blockchain protocol, but it has a number of limitations, including:

  • High transaction costs 
  • Low throughput 
  • Problematic UX  

They are a challenge for blockchain products, including NFTs’ ones, especially because they highly decrease scalability. High gas fees and low fees are particularly detrimental for projects where multiple NFTs are regularly minted and traded, as is in the case of NFT games. 

Therefore, many projects are now exploring the use of Ethereum-compatible blockchain networks as a way to mitigate these limitations while leveraging the benefits of the entire ecosystem. Such networks are called Layer 2 solutions. (You can read more about Layer 2 solutions here). Polygon is definitely one of the most promising. 

As a Layer 2 solution, Polygon addresses the diverse needs of developers by providing tools to create scalable dApps that prioritize security, modularity, and UX. This is made possible through a protocol architecture consisting of Proof of Stake (PoS) Commit Chains and More Viable Plasma (MoreVP).

In a nutshell, the operation of the Matic network relies on Commit Chains, which are transaction networks that run on the main blockchain, Ethereum. Commit Chains to combine transactions into batches, which are then confirmed in bulk before returning the data to Ethereum.  

Zero gas fees 

First thing first: On the Polygon network one can mint, buy, and transfer ownership of NFT for free. Yes, that’s right. Quite a great advantage compared to Layer 1 of Ethereum where minting one NFT can cost even more than $100. 

This is particularly important for NFT games, where multiple NFTs are minted and traded. Polygon network can support it at a low cost, without compromising the security or traceability that Ethereum main network provides. 

Furthermore, Polygon’s NFTs can be easily traded ETH tokens. This will be very convenient for your players, as ETH is one of the most popular, and stable cryptocurrencies, which is present on almost every exchange ( both CEXs and DEXs). 

Immutable X alternatives: Solana
Immutable X alternatives: Solana

Solana 

Contrary to the other protocols mentioned in this article, Solana isn’t a Layer 2 solution based on Ethereum. It's a completely different blockchain. 

Launched in 2020 by the Solana foundation, Solana Blockchain aims to solve scaling problems that struggle with most of the contemporary blockchain protocols. Its main objective is to support Defi ecosystem growth by fitting in the so-called blockchain trilemma: decentralization, security, and scalability.

Combining those three factors seems to be the holy grail of the blockchain world. Many projects succeed in supporting one or even two of the factors, but fail when it comes to others. Solana engineers believe that they have implemented all three.

Solana is a third-generation blockchain that, unlike other blockchains, uses a hybrid consensus algorithm. To be more precise, it combines proof-of-history (PoH) with proof-of-stake (PoS). Due to that, it’s able to process over 50,000 transactions per second.

For comparison, Ehereum can’t handle more than 30 at the same time. Now you know why expectations toward Solana are so high.

Another significant problem with Ethereum’s Layer 1 is the gas fee. Gas fees are a pivotal issue for NFT games because minting and trading NFTs on-chain require paying them. Essentially it would be almost impossible to build NFT games only on Layer 1 because running it would be too expensive both for players and creators. And even if it were possible, the circle of potential players would be extremely narrow. Here, again we go back to problems with scalability.

This is why NFT games’ creators seek to find other protocols that will offer lower fees. As we mention, Solana is definitely one of them. It offers almost zero gas fees. What does it mean? Ethereum gas fee can easily go over $100 when on Solana average cost per transaction is only … $0.00025. Without a doubt, that’s a significant difference.  

Minting NFTs on Solana 

Ok, so we have a fast, very promising blockchain with quickly increasing popularity. Why shouldn’t we use it for NFT minting? Many of the recently emerged NFT projects prove that it might be a tremendous idea. 

Thanks to its speed and low fees, Solana is a perfect solution for every NFT project that involves minting and trading a lot of them. Of course, that includes NFT games. But that’s not everything. Using Solana blockchain it would be even possible to perform most of the game’s mechanics on-chain. 

Immutable X alternatives
Immutable X alternatives

Immutable X

Talking about alternatives for Immutable X, we couldn’t forget about … Immutable X . There are good reasons why it’s considered a milestone for playable NFTs. 

Released in April 2021 Immutable X is the first Layer 2 solution dedicated to playable NFT tokens. Even behind its creation stand game’s developers - Australian team Immutable, responsible for the NFT-based card game - Gods Unchained. They aimed to allow for mass adoption of NFT in games

As one of the multiple blockchain systems, Immutable X was built on top of the scaling Layer 2 technology created by StarWare. Thus, the platform became the first Layer 2 solution dedicated to NFT. This allows users to take advantage of the security provided by Ethereum without having to pay gas.

An alternative to using the Ethereum ecosystem could be to create an entirely new, faster blockchain protocol with a different method of obtaining consensus or to develop side chains that process transactions in their own way. However, according to the creators of Immutable X, such solutions would be insufficient, as they would most likely not reach the level of security that Ethereum guarantees. 

It is security that seems to play a key role here: "If security fails, the same thing happens to the authenticity of NFT, and that would have nightmarish consequences." say the platform's developers.

Optimized NFT  creation

One of the biggest advantages of the platform is the Immutable X Mint tool, which allows you to easily and securely create and distribute ERC-721 and ERC-20 tokens. Its biggest advantages are:

- Zero gas fees

- Immediate ability to trade newly created assets

- Same security as the main Ethereum network. 

Launching your own NFT game is a complicated process. Therefore, any help may be useful. Luckily, Immutable X creators are one of the most cooperative in the whole industry.

If you want to launch your own NFT game you can seriously count on them. They will guide you through their solution, provide development consultations, and in some cases even help with marketing campaigns and scaling. 

Completely carbon neutral 

According to its creator, Immutable X aims to become the first completely carbon neutral NFT focused project in the game. 

Immutable X as a Layer 2 solution is far more energy-efficient than Ethereum. Therefore creating NFT on it entails lower carbon emission. Yet, that's not everything. The platform claims that it will buy carbon credits to offset the energy footprint of any NFT on it. They will continue that practice until Ethereums’s Layer 1 will become fully proof-of-stake. 

NFT game development with Nextrope 

Choosing the right technology solutions can be the first step for the tremendous success of your project. However, you should be aware, that launching an NFT game that will attract a global audience will require great skills and knowledge regarding both the technical and business sides of the Blockchain industry. That’s why many projects decide to hire an external blockchain company as a technological partner.

At Nextrope, we can call ourselves pioneers of Blockchain technology in CEE. We conducted one of the first tokenization in the world and since that we keep up to date with the industry. NFT games aren’t an exception. 

Do you want to know how Nextrope’s team can boost your NFT game on a new level? Feel free to contact our specialists who will gladly answer all your questions.

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

Monte Carlo Simulations in Tokenomics

Kajetan Olas

01 May 2024
Monte Carlo Simulations in Tokenomics

As the web3 field grows in complexity, traditional analytical tools often fall short in capturing the dynamics of digital markets. This is where Monte Carlo simulations come into play, offering a mathematical technique to model systems fraught with uncertainty.

Monte Carlo simulations employ random sampling to understand probable outcomes in processes that are too complex for straightforward analytic solutions. By simulating thousands, or even millions, of scenarios, Monte Carlo methods can provide insights into the likelihood of different outcomes, helping stakeholders make informed decisions under conditions of uncertainty.

In this article, we will explore the role of Monte Carlo simulations within the context of tokenomics.  illustrating how they are employed to forecast market dynamics, assess risk, and optimize strategies in the volatile realm of cryptocurrencies. By integrating this powerful tool, businesses and investors can enhance their analytical capabilities, paving the way for more resilient and adaptable economic models in the digital age.

Understanding Monte Carlo Simulations

The Monte Carlo method is an approach to solving problems that involve random sampling to understand probable outcomes. This technique was first developed in the 1940s by scientists working on the atomic bomb during the Manhattan Project. The method was designed to simplify the complex simulations of neutron diffusion, but it has since evolved to address a broad spectrum of problems across various fields including finance, engineering, and research.

Random Sampling and Statistical Experimentation

At the heart of Monte Carlo simulations is the concept of random sampling from a probability distribution to compute results. This method does not seek a singular precise answer but rather a probability distribution of possible outcomes. By performing a large number of trials with random variables, these simulations mimic the real-life fluctuations and uncertainties inherent in complex systems.

Role of Randomness and Probability Distributions in Simulations

Monte Carlo simulations leverage the power of probability distributions to model potential scenarios in processes where exact outcomes cannot be determined due to uncertainty. Each simulation iteration uses randomly generated values that follow a specific statistical distribution to model different outcomes. This method allows analysts to quantify and visualize the probability of different scenarios occurring.

The strength of Monte Carlo simulations lies in the insight they offer into potential risks. They allow modelers to see into the probabilistic "what-if" scenarios that more closely mimic real-world conditions.

Monte Carlo Simulations in Tokenomics

Monte Carlo simulations are instrumental tool for token engineers. They're so useful due to their ability to model emergent behaviors. Here are some key areas where these simulations are applied:

Pricing and Valuation of Tokens

Determining the value of a new token can be challenging due to the volatile nature of cryptocurrency markets. Monte Carlo simulations help by modeling various market scenarios and price fluctuations over time, allowing analysts to estimate a token's potential future value under different conditions.

Assessing Market Dynamics and Investor Behavior

Cryptocurrency markets are influenced by a myriad of factors including regulatory changes, technological advancements, and shifts in investor sentiment. Monte Carlo methods allow researchers to simulate these variables in an integrated environment to see how they might impact token economics, from overall market cap fluctuations to liquidity concerns.

Assesing Possible Risks

By running a large number of simulations it’s possible to stress-test the project in multiple scenarios and identify emergent risks. This is perhaps the most important function of Monte Carlo Process, since these risks can’t be assessed any other way.

Source: How to use Monte Carlo simulation for reliability analysis?

Benefits of Using Monte Carlo Simulations

By generating a range of possible outcomes and their probabilities, Monte Carlo simulations help decision-makers in the cryptocurrency space anticipate potential futures and make informed strategic choices. This capability is invaluable for planning token launches, managing supply mechanisms, and designing marketing strategies to optimize market penetration.

Using Monte Carlo simulations, stakeholders in the tokenomics field can not only understand and mitigate risks but also explore the potential impact of different strategic decisions. This predictive power supports more robust economic models and can lead to more stable and successful token launches. 

Implementing Monte Carlo Simulations

Several tools and software packages can facilitate the implementation of Monte Carlo simulations in tokenomics. One of the most notable is cadCAD, a Python library that provides a flexible and powerful environment for simulating complex systems. 

Overview of cadCAD configuration Components

To better understand how Monte Carlo simulations work in practice, let’s take a look at the cadCAD code snippet:

sim_config = {

    'T': range(200),  # number of timesteps

    'N': 3,           # number of Monte Carlo runs

    'M': params       # model parameters

}

Explanation of Simulation Configuration Components

T: Number of Time Steps

  • Definition: The 'T' parameter in CadCAD configurations specifies the number of time steps the simulation should execute. Each time step represents one iteration of the model, during which the system is updated. That update is based on various rules defined by token engineers in other parts of the code. For example: we might assume that one iteration = one day, and define data-based functions that predict token demand on that day.

N: Number of Monte Carlo Runs

  • Definition: The 'N' parameter sets the number of Monte Carlo runs. Each run represents a complete execution of the simulation from start to finish, using potentially different random seeds for each run. This is essential for capturing variability and understanding the distribution of possible outcomes. For example, we can acknowledge that token’s price will be correlated with the broad cryptocurrency market, which acts somewhat unpredictably.

M: Model Parameters

  • Definition: The 'M' key contains the model parameters, which are variables that influence system's behavior but do not change dynamically with each time step. These parameters can be constants or distributions that are used within the policy and update functions to model the external and internal factors affecting the system.

Importance of These Components

Together, these components define the skeleton of your Monte Carlo simulation in CadCAD. The combination of multiple time steps and Monte Carlo runs allows for a comprehensive exploration of the stochastic nature of the modeled system. By varying the number of timesteps (T) and runs (N), you can adjust the depth and breadth of the exploration, respectively. The parameters (M) provide the necessary context and ensure that each simulation is realistic.

Messy graph representing Monte Carlo simulation, source: Bitcoin Monte Carlo Simulation

Conclusion

Monte Carlo simulations represent a powerful analytical tool in the arsenal of token engineers. By leveraging the principles of statistics, these simulations provide deep insights into the complex dynamics of token-based systems. This method allows for a nuanced understanding of potential future scenarios and helps with making informed decisions.

We encourage all stakeholders in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space to consider implementing Monte Carlo simulations. The insights gained from such analytical techniques can lead to more effective and resilient economic models, paving the way for the sustainable growth and success of digital currencies.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

FAQ

What is a Monte Carlo simulation in tokenomics context?

  • It's a mathematical method that uses random sampling to predict uncertain outcomes.

What are the benefits of using Monte Carlo simulations in tokenomics?

  • These simulations help foresee potential market scenarios, aiding in strategic planning and risk management for token launches.

Why are Monte Carlo simulations unique in cryptocurrency analysis?

  • They provide probabilistic outcomes rather than fixed predictions, effectively simulating real-world market variability and risk.

Behavioral Economics in Token Design

Kajetan Olas

22 Apr 2024
Behavioral Economics in Token Design

Behavioral economics is a field that explores the effects of psychological factors on economic decision-making. This branch of study is especially pertinent while designing a token since user perception can significantly impact a token's adoption.

We will delve into how token design choices, such as staking yields, token inflation, and lock-up periods, influence consumer behavior. Research studies reveal that the most significant factor for a token's attractiveness isn’t its functionality, but its past price performance. This underscores the impact of speculative factors. Tokens that have shown previous price increases are preferred over those with more beneficial economic features.

Understanding Behavioral Tokenomics

Understanding User Motivations

The design of a cryptocurrency token can significantly influence user behavior by leveraging common cognitive biases and decision-making processes. For instance, the concept of "scarcity" can create a perceived value increase, prompting users to buy or hold a token in anticipation of future gains. Similarly, "loss aversion," a foundational principle of behavioral economics, suggests that the pain of losing is psychologically more impactful than the pleasure of an equivalent gain. In token design, mechanisms that minimize perceived losses (e.g. anti-dumping measures) can encourage long-term holding.

Incentives and Rewards

Behavioral economics also provides insight into how incentives can be structured to maximize user participation. Cryptocurrencies often use tokens as a form of reward for various behaviors, including mining, staking, or participating in governance through voting. The way these rewards are framed and distributed can greatly affect their effectiveness. For example, offering tokens as rewards for achieving certain milestones can tap into the 'endowment effect,' where people ascribe more value to things simply because they own them.

Social Proof and Network Effects

Social proof, where individuals copy the behavior of others, plays a crucial role in the adoption of tokens. Tokens that are seen being used and promoted by influential figures within the community can quickly gain traction, as new users emulate successful investors. The network effect further amplifies this, where the value of a token increases as more people start using it. This can be seen in the rapid growth of tokens like Ethereum, where the broad adoption of its smart contract functionality created a snowball effect, attracting even more developers and users.

Token Utility and Behavioral Levers

The utility of a token—what it can be used for—is also crucial. Tokens designed to offer real-world applications beyond mere financial speculation can provide more stable value retention. Integrating behavioral economics into utility design involves creating tokens that not only serve practical purposes but also resonate on an emotional level with users, encouraging engagement and investment. For example, tokens that offer governance rights might appeal to users' desire for control and influence within a platform, encouraging them to hold rather than sell.

Understanding Behavioral Tokenomics

Intersection of Behavioral Economics and Tokenomics

Behavioral economics examines how psychological influences, various biases, and the way in which information is framed affect individual decisions. In tokenomics, these factors can significantly impact the success or failure of a cryptocurrency by influencing user behavior towards investment

Influence of Psychological Factors on Token Attraction

A recent study observed that the attractiveness of a token often hinges more on its historical price performance than on intrinsic benefits like yield returns or innovative economic models. This emphasizes the fact that the cryptocurrency sector is still young, and therefore subject to speculative behaviors

The Effect of Presentation and Context

Another interesting finding from the study is the impact of how tokens are presented. In scenarios where tokens are evaluated separately, the influence of their economic attributes on consumer decisions is minimal. However, when tokens are assessed side by side, these attributes become significantly more persuasive. This highlights the importance of context in economic decision-making—a core principle of behavioral economics. It’s easy to translate this into real-life example - just think about the concept of staking yields. When told that the yield on e.g. Cardano is 5% you might not think much of it. But, if you were simultaneously told that Anchor’s yield is 19%, then that 5% seems like a tragic deal.

Implications for Token Designers

The application of behavioral economics to the design of cryptocurrency tokens involves leveraging human psychology to encourage desired behaviors. Here are several core principles of behavioral economics and how they can be effectively utilized in token design:

Leveraging Price Performance

Studies show clearly: “price going up” tends to attract users more than most other token attributes. This finding implies that token designers need to focus on strategies that can showcase their economic effects in the form of price increases. This means that e.g. it would be more beneficial to conduct a buy-back program than to conduct an airdrop.

Scarcity and Perceived Value

Scarcity triggers a sense of urgency and increases perceived value. Cryptocurrency tokens can be designed to have a limited supply, mimicking the scarcity of resources like gold. This not only boosts the perceived rarity and value of the tokens but also drives demand due to the "fear of missing out" (FOMO). By setting a cap on the total number of tokens, developers can create a natural scarcity that may encourage early adoption and long-term holding.

Initial Supply Considerations

The initial supply represents the number of tokens that are available in circulation immediately following the token's launch. The chosen number can influence early market perceptions. For instance, a large initial supply might suggest a lower value per token, which could attract speculators. Data shows that tokens with low nominal value are highly volatile and generally underperform. Understanding how the initial supply can influence investor behavior is important for ensuring the token's stability.

Managing Maximum Supply and Inflation

A finite maximum supply can safeguard the token against inflation, potentially enhancing its value by ensuring scarcity. On the other hand, the inflation rate, which defines the pace at which new tokens are introduced, influences the token's value and user trust.

Investors in cryptocurrency markets show a notable aversion to deflationary tokenomics. Participants are less likely to invest in tokens with a deflationary framework, viewing them as riskier and potentially less profitable. Research suggests that while moderate inflation can be perceived neutrally or even positively, high inflation does not enhance attractiveness, and deflation is distinctly unfavorable.

Source: Behavioral Tokenomics: Consumer Perceptions of Cryptocurrency Token Design

These findings suggest that token designers should avoid high deflation rates, which could deter investment and user engagement. Instead, a balanced approach to inflation, avoiding extremes, appears to be preferred among cryptocurrency investors.

Loss Aversion

People tend to prefer avoiding losses to acquiring equivalent gains; this is known as loss aversion. In token design, this can be leveraged by introducing mechanisms that protect against losses, such as staking rewards that offer consistent returns or features that minimize price volatility. Additionally, creating tokens that users can "earn" through participation or contribution to the network can tap into this principle by making users feel they are safeguarding an investment or adding protective layers to their holdings.

Social Proof

Social proof is a powerful motivator in user adoption and engagement. When potential users see others adopting a token, especially influential figures or peers, they are more likely to perceive it as valuable and trustworthy. Integrating social proof into token marketing strategies, such as showcasing high-profile endorsements or community support, can significantly enhance user acquisition and retention.

Mental Accounting

Mental accounting involves how people categorize and treat money differently depending on its source or intended use. Tokens can be designed to encourage specific spending behaviors by being categorized for certain types of transactions—like tokens that are specifically for governance, others for staking, and others still for transaction fees. By distinguishing tokens in this way, users can more easily rationalize holding or spending them based on their designated purposes.

Endowment Effect

The endowment effect occurs when people value something more highly simply because they own it. For tokenomics, creating opportunities for users to feel ownership can increase attachment and perceived value. This can be done through mechanisms that reward users with tokens for participation or contribution, thus making them more reluctant to part with their holdings because they value them more highly.

Conclusion

By considering how behavioral factors influence market perception, token engineers can create much more effective ecosystems. Ensuring high demand for the token, means ensuring proper funding for the project in general.

If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.

FAQ

How does the initial supply of a token influence its market perception?

  • The initial supply sets the perceived value of a token; a larger supply might suggest a lower per-token value.

Why is the maximum supply important in token design?

  • A finite maximum supply signals scarcity, helping protect against inflation and enhance long-term value.

How do investors perceive inflation and deflation in cryptocurrencies?

  • Investors generally dislike deflationary tokens and view them as risky. Moderate inflation is seen neutrally or positively, while high inflation is not favored.