ERC-1400 vs ERC-3643 – Comparing Token Standards

Miłosz Mach

08 Jan 2024
ERC-1400 vs ERC-3643 – Comparing Token Standards

Imagine a world where the complexities of finance and the ingenuity of blockchain technology converge harmoniously. ERC-1400, a standard that has established rules around securities offerings, and on the other side, ERC-3643 - versatile in broadening technology utilization and tokenization horizons. They are keystones of modern funds management, each with its unique flair and profound implications. As we navigate their nuances, we’ll shed light on their roles, differences, and analogies.

Understanding ERC-1400


Origins and Purpose of ERC-1400

ERC-1400 introduces a standard for security tokens on the Ethereum blockchain. Security tokens, which illustrate digital forms of traditional investment contracts like stocks, bonds, and company shares require a token standard capable of navigating this intricate regulatory environment. The intent was to bring clarity and purified structure to the tokenization of securities, ensuring the process is compliant with existing laws and regulations. Such instruments, in particular, demand a future-thinking approach sticking to the thorough financial legal framework and its progressive traits.

Key Features of ERC-1400

ERC-1400 is characterized by several features that serve the specific needs of security tokens:

Compliance with Financial Regulations

Control and Transparency

Granular Oversight of Transactions empowers issuers with monitored access to token operations, essential for financial compliance and investor trust. The standard enables rules enforcement and qualifications for each transfer. That means all movements of the token adhere to platform operational criteria. The level of legitimacy provided by ERC-1400 supports the credibility of security token offerings, both in the eyes of regulators and institutional investors.

Comparative Analysis: ERC-1400 vs ERC-3643

ERC-1400 and ERC-3643 cater to distinct needs and scenarios. This analysis aims to contrast features, applications, and the different problems they address.

Wondering what is ERC-3643 all about and how it works? Click to learn more in our latest article.

Table 1: Core Characteristics and Use Cases

Table 2: Technical Features and Institutional Adoption

Unifying the Standards

Before exploring the differing attributes, it's important to recognize the familiar ground shared by ERC-1400 and ERC-3643:

Regulatory Compliance Focus

  • Common Goal for Ordinances Implementation: Both standards supervise legal regulatory alignment;
  • Bridging Traditional Finance and Blockchain: They facilitate wider use of blockchain in traditional economic sectors.

Modular Architecture

  • Flexibility and Customization: The solutions inherent in ERC-1400 and ERC-3643 allow developers to influence certain details of the token or adapt features to meet specific needs, from top-down legislation to highly advanced technological refinements;
  • Adaptability for Future Enhancements: This is not only about meeting current essentials but also about paving the way for future enhancement. As per their modular structure, changes can be made without the need for system overhauling, thereby future-proofing the token standards.

Distinctive Features and Differences

While ERC-1400 and ERC-3643 allocate these foundational similarities, they diverge in their purpose, scope, and technical implementations.

ERC-1400: Specialized for Security Tokens

Targeted Use Case

  • ERC-1400 serves the domain of security tokens, which are digital versions of aforementioned stocks or bonds. This standard addresses applicable and potential regulatory challenges associated with their tokenization.

Investor Protection and Financial Compliance

  • It commits to investor protection guaranteeing detailed party verification, and the proper maintenance of holders' rights.

ERC-3643: Broader Scope for Asset Tokenization

Versatile Tokenization

  • Unlike ERC-1400, ERC-3643 accommodates a wide range of assets beyond securities.

Reinforced Token Control 

  • Advanced token behavior patterns provide issuers with a higher degree of customization and control;
  • Optimized gas cost and streamlined contract processes also make it well-suited for high transaction volume and large-scale applications.

Conclusion

The comparative journey through ERC-1400 vs ERC-3643 reveals a harmonious standards coexistence. Together, despite a different purpose, they reflect the dynamic nature of blockchain technology. ERC-1400 and ERC-3643 shape the future of technology, and accordingly, with their introduction, the community has been equipped with a solid fundament to actively participate in any asset digitization.

If you are interested in utilizing ERC-3643 or other blockchain-based solutions for your project, please reach out to contact@nextrope.com

FAQ

What are the key features of ERC-1400?

  • ERC-1400 embeds legal governance into the token lifecycle, ensuring compliance with securities regulations, and provides granular oversight of transactions, enhancing control and transparency.

How do ERC-1400 and ERC-3643 unify standards?

  • Both standards focus on regulatory compliance and bridging traditional finance with blockchain technology. They feature modular architecture, offering flexibility for customization and adaptability for future enhancements.

What is the purpose of ERC-1400 and ERC-3643?

  • ERC-1400 specializes in security tokens, addressing regulatory challenges and ensuring investor protection. ERC-3643 has a broader scope for asset tokenization, providing advanced token control and optimization for high transaction volume applications.

Tagi

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

The Ultimate Web3 Backend Guide: Supercharge dApps with APIs

Tomasz Dybowski

04 Mar 2025
The Ultimate Web3 Backend Guide: Supercharge dApps with APIs

Introduction

Web3 backend development is essential for building scalable, efficient and decentralized applications (dApps) on EVM-compatible blockchains like Ethereum, Polygon, and Base. A robust Web3 backend enables off-chain computations, efficient data management and better security, ensuring seamless interaction between smart contracts, databases and frontend applications.

Unlike traditional Web2 applications that rely entirely on centralized servers, Web3 applications aim to minimize reliance on centralized entities. However, full decentralization isn't always possible or practical, especially when it comes to high-performance requirements, user authentication or storing large datasets. A well-structured backend in Web3 ensures that these limitations are addressed, allowing for a seamless user experience while maintaining decentralization where it matters most.

Furthermore, dApps require efficient backend solutions to handle real-time data processing, reduce latency, and provide smooth user interactions. Without a well-integrated backend, users may experience delays in transactions, inconsistencies in data retrieval, and inefficiencies in accessing decentralized services. Consequently, Web3 backend development is a crucial component in ensuring a balance between decentralization, security, and functionality.

This article explores:

  • When and why Web3 dApps need a backend
  • Why not all applications should be fully on-chain
  • Architecture examples of hybrid dApps
  • A comparison between APIs and blockchain-based logic

This post kicks off a Web3 backend development series, where we focus on the technical aspects of implementing Web3 backend solutions for decentralized applications.

Why Do Some Web3 Projects Need a Backend?

Web3 applications seek to achieve decentralization, but real-world constraints often necessitate hybrid architectures that include both on-chain and off-chain components. While decentralized smart contracts provide trustless execution, they come with significant limitations, such as high gas fees, slow transaction finality, and the inability to store large amounts of data. A backend helps address these challenges by handling logic and data management more efficiently while still ensuring that core transactions remain secure and verifiable on-chain.

Moreover, Web3 applications must consider user experience. Fully decentralized applications often struggle with slow transaction speeds, which can negatively impact usability. A hybrid backend allows for pre-processing operations off-chain while committing final results to the blockchain. This ensures that users experience fast and responsive interactions without compromising security and transparency.

While decentralization is a core principle of blockchain technology, many dApps still rely on a Web2-style backend for practical reasons:

1. Performance & Scalability in Web3 Backend Development

  • Smart contracts are expensive to execute and require gas fees for every interaction.
  • Offloading non-essential computations to a backend reduces costs and improves performance.
  • Caching and load balancing mechanisms in traditional backends ensure smooth dApp performance and improve response times for dApp users.
  • Event-driven architectures using tools like Redis or Kafka can help manage asynchronous data processing efficiently.

2. Web3 APIs for Data Storage and Off-Chain Access

  • Storing large amounts of data on-chain is impractical due to high costs.
  • APIs allow dApps to store & fetch off-chain data (e.g. user profiles, transaction history).
  • Decentralized storage solutions like IPFS, Arweave and Filecoin can be used for storing immutable data (e.g. NFT metadata), but a Web2 backend helps with indexing and querying structured data efficiently.

3. Advanced Logic & Data Aggregation in Web3 Backend

  • Some dApps need complex business logic that is inefficient or impossible to implement in a smart contract.
  • Backend APIs allow for data aggregation from multiple sources, including oracles (e.g. Chainlink) and off-chain databases.
  • Middleware solutions like The Graph help in indexing blockchain data efficiently, reducing the need for on-chain computation.

4. User Authentication & Role Management in Web3 dApps

  • Many applications require user logins, permissions or KYC compliance.
  • Blockchain does not natively support session-based authentication, requiring a backend for handling this logic.
  • Tools like Firebase Auth, Auth0 or Web3Auth can be used to integrate seamless authentication for Web3 applications.

5. Cost Optimization with Web3 APIs

  • Every change in a smart contract requires a new audit, costing tens of thousands of dollars.
  • By handling logic off-chain where possible, projects can minimize expensive redeployments.
  • Using layer 2 solutions like Optimism, Arbitrum and zkSync can significantly reduce gas costs.

Web3 Backend Development: Tools and Technologies

A modern Web3 backend integrates multiple tools to handle smart contract interactions, data storage, and security. Understanding these tools is crucial to developing a scalable and efficient backend for dApps. Without the right stack, developers may face inefficiencies, security risks, and scaling challenges that limit the adoption of their Web3 applications.

Unlike traditional backend development, Web3 requires additional considerations, such as decentralized authentication, smart contract integration, and secure data management across both on-chain and off-chain environments.

Here’s an overview of the essential Web3 backend tech stack:

1. API Development for Web3 Backend Services

  • Node.js is the go-to backend runtime good for Web3 applications due to its asynchronous event-driven architecture.
  • NestJS is a framework built on top of Node.js, providing modular architecture and TypeScript support for structured backend development.

2. Smart Contract Interaction Libraries for Web3 Backend

  • Ethers.js and Web3.js are TypeScript/JavaScript libraries used for interacting with Ethereum-compatible blockchains.

3. Database Solutions for Web3 Backend

  • PostgreSQL: Structured database used for storing off-chain transactional data.
  • MongoDB: NoSQL database for flexible schema data storage.
  • Firebase: A set of tools used, among other things, for user authentication.
  • The Graph: Decentralized indexing protocol used to query blockchain data efficiently.

4. Cloud Services and Hosting for Web3 APIs

When It Doesn't Make Sense to Go Fully On-Chain

Decentralization is valuable, but it comes at a cost. Fully on-chain applications suffer from performance limitations, high costs and slow execution speeds. For many use cases, a hybrid Web3 architecture that utilizes a mix of blockchain-based and off-chain components provides a more scalable and cost-effective solution.

In some cases, forcing full decentralization is unnecessary and inefficient. A hybrid Web3 architecture balances decentralization and practicality by allowing non-essential logic and data storage to be handled off-chain while maintaining trustless and verifiable interactions on-chain.

The key challenge when designing a hybrid Web3 backend is ensuring that off-chain computations remain auditable and transparent. This can be achieved through cryptographic proofs, hash commitments and off-chain data attestations that anchor trust into the blockchain while improving efficiency.

For example, Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups allow computations to happen off-chain while only submitting finalized data to Ethereum, reducing fees and increasing throughput. Similarly, state channels enable fast, low-cost transactions that only require occasional settlement on-chain.

A well-balanced Web3 backend architecture ensures that critical dApp functionalities remain decentralized while offloading resource-intensive tasks to off-chain systems. This makes applications cheaper, faster and more user-friendly while still adhering to blockchain's principles of transparency and security.

Example: NFT-based Game with Off-Chain Logic

Imagine a Web3 game where users buy, trade and battle NFT-based characters. While asset ownership should be on-chain, other elements like:

  • Game logic (e.g., matchmaking, leaderboard calculations)
  • User profiles & stats
  • Off-chain notifications

can be handled off-chain to improve speed and cost-effectiveness.

Architecture Diagram

Below is an example diagram showing how a hybrid Web3 application splits responsibilities between backend and blockchain components.

Hybrid Web3 Architecture

Comparing Web3 Backend APIs vs. Blockchain-Based Logic

FeatureWeb3 Backend (API)Blockchain (Smart Contracts)
Change ManagementCan be updated easilyEvery change requires a new contract deployment
CostTraditional hosting feesHigh gas fees + costly audits
Data StorageCan store large datasetsLimited and expensive storage
SecuritySecure but relies on centralized infrastructureFully decentralized & trustless
PerformanceFast response timesLimited by blockchain throughput

Reducing Web3 Costs with AI Smart Contract Audit

One of the biggest pain points in Web3 development is the cost of smart contract audits. Each change to the contract code requires a new audit, often costing tens of thousands of dollars.

To address this issue, Nextrope is developing an AI-powered smart contract auditing tool, which:

  • Reduces audit costs by automating code analysis.
  • Speeds up development cycles by catching vulnerabilities early.
  • Improves security by providing quick feedback.

This AI-powered solution will be a game-changer for the industry, making smart contract development more cost-effective and accessible.

Conclusion

Web3 backend development plays a crucial role in scalable and efficient dApps. While full decentralization is ideal in some cases, many projects benefit from a hybrid architecture, where off-chain components optimize performance, reduce costs and improve user experience.

In future posts in this Web3 backend series, we’ll explore specific implementation details, including:

  • How to design a Web3 API for dApps
  • Best practices for integrating backend services
  • Security challenges and solutions

Stay tuned for the next article in this series!

Nextrope Launches “AI-Powered Smart Contract Auditing” Project

Miłosz Mach

03 Mar 2025
Nextrope Launches “AI-Powered Smart Contract Auditing” Project

Next Enterprises Sp. z o.o. is implementing a project co-financed by the European Funds, titled "Smart Contract Auditing with Artificial Intelligence". The goal of the project is to develop and deploy an advanced AI model that enables efficient analysis, vulnerability detection, and security auditing of smart contracts, taking into account their complexity and uniqueness.

Planned Project Tasks:

  • Development of an AI model trained on Solidity keywords;
  • Creation of an effective model in simulated conditions;
  • Analysis of the unpredictability of compiled code execution within the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) in the context of the developed model in a controlled environment;
  • Validation of the model in real-world conditions.

Target Groups:

  • Specialized audit firms focused on smart contract security;
  • Companies developing and/or deploying smart contracts on various platforms;
  • Exchanges, wallet providers, and decentralized applications (dApps) in the blockchain sector;
  • Government agencies or industry compliance bodies responsible for blockchain technology regulation;
  • Smart contract security specialists and developers.

The implementation of the developed tool will enable automated and efficient auditing of smart contracts. The model will provide detailed insights and recommendations for optimizing transaction costs and improving contract performance. As a result, users will be able to make informed decisions, enhancing security and operational efficiency within the blockchain ecosystem. Key benefits stem from the model’s training on smart contract code, audit data, and detected vulnerabilities. Additionally, the incorporation of chaos theory principles will allow for more precise risk and anomaly forecasting.

By deploying this advanced AI model, the project will enhance the security, efficiency, and accessibility of blockchain technology for end users. This will translate into tangible social and economic benefits, including:

  1. Economic Security
  2. Business and Financial Security
  3. Increased Public Trust
  4. Optimization of Transaction Costs
  5. Support for Innovation and Entrepreneurship
  6. Education and Public Awareness

Project Value: 4,173,953.24 PLN
European Funds Contribution: 3,090,156.39 PLN

#EUFunds #EuropeanFunds

Challenges in Smart Contract Auditing

Smart contracts have become a fundamental component of blockchain technology, eliminating intermediaries, and automating processes. However, their growing significance also introduces new challenges, particularly in ensuring security and compliance with industry standards.

Traditional smart contract audits rely heavily on manual code reviews, which are expensive, time-consuming, and prone to human error. As cyber threats continue to evolve, the use of advanced technologies to support the auditing process is imperative.

The Role of AI in Data Analysis

Artificial intelligence (AI) introduces a new paradigm in smart contract security assessment by leveraging its capability to process vast amounts of data and identify patterns that may go unnoticed with traditional auditing methods. AI enables:

  • Automated code analysis and real-time detection of potential vulnerabilities,
  • Optimization of auditing processes by reducing human errors and improving threat identification efficiency,
  • Better adaptation to evolving regulatory requirements and emerging threats within the blockchain ecosystem,
  • Rapid analysis of large datasets, allowing for quick insights and the detection of non-obvious dependencies in smart contract code.

By utilizing AI, the auditing process becomes more comprehensive, precise, and scalable, enabling continuous risk monitoring and adaptation to new attack vectors.

A New Era of Smart Contract Security with AI

With the support of European Funds under the European Funds for a Modern Economy (FENG) program, we are conducting research on next-generation blockchain auditing methods, reinforcing Nextrope’s position as a leader in innovative technology solutions.

The "Smart Contract Auditing with Artificial Intelligence (AI)" project contributes to key aspects of blockchain security by:

  • Automating smart contract audits, accelerating verification processes, and improving their accuracy,
  • Optimizing costs, making professional audits more accessible to a broader range of entities,
  • Raising security standards and enhancing regulatory compliance,
  • Increasing trust in smart contracts, fostering broader technology adoption.

Interested in learning more about our project or discovering how to utilize AI in your company? 📩 Contact us at contact@nextrope.com for further details!

Tagi