Implementing Multi-Signature Wallets: A Developer’s Guide

Karolina

09 Jun 2023
Implementing Multi-Signature Wallets: A Developer’s Guide

Blockchain technology, artificial intelligence (AI), and cryptocurrencies have transformed how digital transactions and value exchanges occur. It is crucial to ensure the security of digital assets as businesses and individuals adopt these technologies. One vital aspect of protecting digital assets is employing multi-signature wallets.

In this developer's guide, we will dive deep into multi-signature wallets, equipping you with the knowledge and insights needed for successful implementation. For blockchain developers, cryptocurrency exchange platforms, or companies handling high-value transactions, understanding multi-signature wallets is vital to improve security and reduce the risks associated with single-key wallets.

This guide will discuss the definition and concept of multi-signature wallets, their advantages and use cases, and examine the key elements that contribute to their security and robustness. We will also offer a step-by-step breakdown of the implementation process, including wallet generation, transaction creation and signing, as well as wallet recovery and key management.

Additionally, we will tackle common challenges developers face when implementing multi-signature wallets and provide best practices for overcoming these obstacles. By the conclusion of this guide, you will possess a thorough understanding of multi-signature wallets and have the essential knowledge to incorporate them into your blockchain-based applications or systems.

Understanding Multi-Signature Wallets

Explanation and Principle

Within the realm of cryptocurrencies, a multi-signature wallet, commonly referred to as a multisig wallet, is a digital wallet variety that mandates multiple signatures for transaction authorization. In contrast to conventional single-key wallets that depend on one private key for approving transactions, multi-signature wallets allocate signing authority among several participants.

The core idea of multi-signature wallets focuses on enhancing security while minimizing the chances of unauthorized access or fraudulent transactions. By necessitating multiple signatures, these wallets add an extra layer of defense, making it harder for ill-intentioned actors to breach the wallet and pilfer digital assets.

Check out the list of 12 Multi-sig wallets

Benefits and Applications

  • Security Enhancement

Comparing with single-key wallets, multi-signature wallets notably improve security levels. Requiring multiple signatures makes it difficult for an intruder to seize the wallet's control and carry out unauthorized transactions. The wallet remains protected even if one key is compromised as more signatures are necessary.

  • Organizational Settings

Corporate settings greatly benefit from multi-signature wallets when multiple stakeholders' approvals are needed for financial procedures. Employing such a wallet enables organizations to guarantee that no lone individual exercises full control over the company's funds, thus diminishing the possibility of internal fraud.

  • Cryptocurrency Exchanges and High-Value Transactions

Handling considerable quantities of digital assets, cryptocurrency exchanges become appealing targets for cybercriminals. By adopting multi-signature wallets, these exchanges can implement rigorous security protocols, mandating multiple authorizations for withdrawals and reducing unauthorized asset transfer risks.

  • Escrow Functions

Multi-signature wallets frequently serve in escrow functions, where a neutral third party retains funds during a transaction until specified conditions have been met. The presence of multiple signatures assures that every party in the transaction provides consent before releasing the funds.

  • Jointly Managed Accounts

In scenarios where numerous individuals or entities jointly manage a digital asset wallet, such as business collaborations or familial accounts, multi-signature wallets guarantee collective transaction decision-making, mitigating the chances of unilateral actions and fostering trust among members.

By understanding multi-signature wallets' benefits and applications, one can lay the groundwork for utilizing their potential in fortifying digital asset security. In the following section, we will delve into multi-signature wallets' fundamental components, offering insights into their functioning and contribution to the overall security structure.

Essential Elements of Multi-Signature Wallets

Several vital elements make up a multi-signature wallet, working collectively to maintain its security and functionality. For developers who aim to effectively implement multi-signature wallet solutions, grasping these essential components is critical. Let's examine these elements more closely:

Public and Private Keys

  • Public Keys

Generated from their corresponding private keys, public keys are cryptographic addresses that function as unique identifiers for receiving funds in a multi-signature wallet. These public keys can be shared freely and utilized by anyone to confirm the legitimacy of transactions linked with the wallet.

  • Private Keys

Private keys are confidential, randomly created cryptographic codes that allow access to the funds held within a multi-signature wallet. Each participant in such a wallet owns a private key which must be securely stored and not shared with unauthorized parties to prevent unwarranted access to the wallet.

Signature Threshold

  • Signature Requirement

The signature threshold refers to the minimum number of signatures needed to approve a transaction from a multi-signature wallet. This determines the security level and control over the wallet. A 2-of-3 signature threshold, for instance, would necessitate two out of three authorized participants' approval for a transaction.

  • Flexibility and Security

Selecting an appropriate signature threshold depends on finding the right balance between flexibility and security. A higher threshold ensures increased security through requiring more signatures but might create difficulties regarding transaction speed and convenience. In contrast, a lower threshold offers more flexibility but could jeopardize security.

Address Types

  • Pay-to-Script-Hash (P2SH)

P2SH is a commonly used address type for multi-signature wallets, enabling the creation of a redeem script that defines the conditions necessary for spending funds. The redeem script comprises authorized participants' public keys and the signature threshold.

  • Pay-to-Witness-Script-Hash (P2WSH)

Introduced alongside the Segregated Witness (SegWit) upgrade, P2WSH is an address type that offers enhanced security and decreased transaction size. P2WSH addresses place the redeem script within the transaction's witness section, improving the scalability and efficiency of multi-signature transactions.

Comprehending the roles and functionalities of these crucial components is fundamental for successfully implementing multi-signature wallets. In the subsequent section, we will explore the implementation process of multi-signature wallets in-depth, equipping developers with a comprehensive guide to effectively generate, transact, and manage these wallets.

Implementing Multi-Signature Wallets

For the successful implementation of multi-signature wallets, it is crucial to follow secure principles and pay close attention to detail. In this part, we present a comprehensive guide to aid developers in incorporating multi-signature wallets seamlessly into their applications or systems.

Generating Wallets

  • Establish Signature Threshold

Select the optimal signature threshold based on your multi-signature wallet's security needs and flexibility.

  • Produce Public/Private Key Pairs

Using cryptographic libraries or tools, produce a unique public/private key pair for every individual involved in the multi-signature wallet. Guarantee that the keys are safely generated and stored, adhering to key management best practices.

  • Construct Multi-Signature Address

Employ suitable libraries or tools to construct a multi-signature address, like a P2SH or P2WSH address. Define the necessary number of signatures and input the authorized participants' public keys.

Creating and Signing Transactions

  • Identify Transaction Inputs and Outputs

Determine the transaction inputs (funds being used) and outputs (target addresses) for the intended transaction from the multi-signature wallet.

  • Assemble Transaction

Construct the transaction using the transaction details and the multi-signature address as input. Make sure that the transaction complies with your chosen blockchain platform's rules and protocols.

  • Authorize Transaction

All authorized members must employ their private keys to authorize the transaction. Merge the signatures as needed by the signature threshold.

Recovery of Wallets and Key Management

  • Backup and Safekeeping of Keys

Securely backup and keep all private keys related to the multi-signature wallet. Utilize secure storage solutions like hardware wallets, encrypted digital storage, or offline backups.

  • Rotation of Keys

To improve security, think about employing key rotation strategies periodically. Generate new key pairs and modify the multi-signature wallet setup accordingly. Manage the shift to new keys carefully to prevent any interference with wallet operations.

  • Establishing Recovery Procedures

Develop a recovery plan for situations where keys are lost or compromised. Lay out the actions and protocols for retrieving funds from the multi-signature wallet, which includes verifying participants' identities and initiating the necessary key replacement or regeneration.

Adhering to these implementation guidelines enables developers to effectively integrate multi-signature wallets into their blockchain-based applications or systems. It is essential to recognize that challenges might present themselves during implementation. In the following section, we will explore common obstacles and offer best practices for developers working with multi-signature wallets.

Common Challenges and Best Practices

Implementing multi-signature wallets can present certain challenges for developers. In this section, we will explore some common challenges and provide best practices to overcome them effectively.

Common Challenges

  • Compatibility with Existing Wallets and Services

Integrating multi-signature wallets with existing wallets or services may pose compatibility challenges. Ensure compatibility by verifying the supported address types and transaction formats of the wallets and services involved.

  • Key Management

Managing and securely storing private keys can be complex, especially when multiple participants are involved. Implement robust key management practices, such as encryption, hardware wallets, or distributed key management systems, to safeguard the private keys.

  • User Experience

Multi-signature transactions require additional steps and coordination between participants, which can impact user experience. Streamline the user interface and provide clear instructions to ensure a smooth and intuitive experience for users interacting with the multi-signature wallet.

Best Practices

  • Security Measures

Implement rigorous security measures throughout the entire development and deployment process. This includes secure key generation, encryption, secure storage of keys, secure communication channels, and comprehensive testing for vulnerabilities.

  • Code Reviews and Audits

Conduct regular code reviews and security audits to identify and address potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the implementation of the multi-signature wallet. Engage external security experts to perform thorough audits for an unbiased evaluation.

  • Thorough Testing

Perform extensive testing of the multi-signature wallet implementation, including unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end tests. Test various scenarios and edge cases to ensure the reliability and robustness of the wallet.

Documentation and Education:

Provide clear and comprehensive documentation for developers and users on how to interact with the multi-signature wallet. Educate users about the benefits and security features of multi-signature wallets to build trust and encourage adoption.

  • Regulatory Compliance

Consider regulatory requirements and compliance standards applicable to your jurisdiction when implementing multi-signature wallets. Ensure adherence to relevant regulations, such as Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements.

By adhering to these best practices, developers can mitigate risks, enhance security, and improve the overall functionality and user experience of multi-signature wallets.

Read also our guide - Building Decentralized Oracles

Conclusion

Multi-signature wallets boost security and management of digital assets by necessitating multiple authorizing signatures for transactions. In this guide, we delved into the meaning, merits, and essential aspects of multi-signature wallets. A comprehensive implementation tutorial was presented for developers, encompassing wallet creation, transaction generation and signing, along with wallet restoration and key administration.

Implementation of multi-signature wallets can pose challenges; however, adhering to best practices such as stringent security protocols, code examinations, exhaustive testing, and ample documentation can aid in surmounting these hurdles. By employing multi-signature wallets, both businesses and individuals can safeguard their digital holdings, especially in corporate settings, exchanges, high-value deals, escrow provisions, and shared accounts.

As blockchain technology advances and influences diverse sectors, prioritizing digital asset safety and integrity is imperative. Adopting multi-signature wallets plays a pivotal role in accomplishing this aim. By grasping the notions and best practices detailed in this guide, developers are well-equipped to incorporate multi-signature wallets into their software applications, fortifying security and guaranteeing the reliability of transactions in the virtual space.

Do you need help with Implementing Multi-Signature Wallets? Or maybe you look for exceptional Web3 & Blockchain developers for your project? Contact us!

Tagi

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

AI-Driven Frontend Automation: Elevating Developer Productivity to New Heights

Gracjan Prusik

11 Mar 2025
AI-Driven Frontend Automation: Elevating Developer Productivity to New Heights

AI Revolution in the Frontend Developer's Workshop

In today's world, programming without AI support means giving up a powerful tool that radically increases a developer's productivity and efficiency. For the modern developer, AI in frontend automation is not just a curiosity, but a key tool that enhances productivity. From automatically generating components, to refactoring, and testing – AI tools are fundamentally changing our daily work, allowing us to focus on the creative aspects of programming instead of the tedious task of writing repetitive code. In this article, I will show how these tools are most commonly used to work faster, smarter, and with greater satisfaction.

This post kicks off a series dedicated to the use of AI in frontend automation, where we will analyze and discuss specific tools, techniques, and practical use cases of AI that help developers in their everyday tasks.

AI in Frontend Automation – How It Helps with Code Refactoring

One of the most common uses of AI is improving code quality and finding errors. These tools can analyze code and suggest optimizations. As a result, we will be able to write code much faster and significantly reduce the risk of human error.

How AI Saves Us from Frustrating Bugs

Imagine this situation: you spend hours debugging an application, not understanding why data isn't being fetched. Everything seems correct, the syntax is fine, yet something isn't working. Often, the problem lies in small details that are hard to catch when reviewing the code.

Let’s take a look at an example:

function fetchData() {
    fetch("htts://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts")
      .then((response) => response.json())
      .then((data) => console.log(data))
      .catch((error) => console.error(error));
}

At first glance, the code looks correct. However, upon running it, no data is retrieved. Why? There’s a typo in the URL – "htts" instead of "https." This is a classic example of an error that could cost a developer hours of frustrating debugging.

When we ask AI to refactor this code, not only will we receive a more readable version using newer patterns (async/await), but also – and most importantly – AI will automatically detect and fix the typo in the URL:

async function fetchPosts() {
    try {
      const response = await fetch(
        "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts"
      );
      const data = await response.json();
      console.log(data);
    } catch (error) {
      console.error(error);
    }
}

How AI in Frontend Automation Speeds Up UI Creation

One of the most obvious applications of AI in frontend development is generating UI components. Tools like GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, or Claude can generate component code based on a short description or an image provided to them.

With these tools, we can create complex user interfaces in just a few seconds. Generating a complete, functional UI component often takes less than a minute. Furthermore, the generated code is typically error-free, includes appropriate animations, and is fully responsive, adapting to different screen sizes. It is important to describe exactly what we expect.

Here’s a view generated by Claude after entering the request: “Based on the loaded data, display posts. The page should be responsive. The main colors are: #CCFF89, #151515, and #E4E4E4.”

Generated posts view

AI in Code Analysis and Understanding

AI can analyze existing code and help understand it, which is particularly useful in large, complex projects or code written by someone else.

Example: Generating a summary of a function's behavior

Let’s assume we have a function for processing user data, the workings of which we don’t understand at first glance. AI can analyze the code and generate a readable explanation:

function processUserData(users) {
  return users
    .filter(user => user.isActive) // Checks the `isActive` value for each user and keeps only the objects where `isActive` is true
    .map(user => ({ 
      id: user.id, // Retrieves the `id` value from each user object
      name: `${user.firstName} ${user.lastName}`, // Creates a new string by combining `firstName` and `lastName`
      email: user.email.toLowerCase(), // Converts the email address to lowercase
    }));
}

In this case, AI not only summarizes the code's functionality but also breaks down individual operations into easier-to-understand segments.

AI in Frontend Automation – Translations and Error Detection

Every frontend developer knows that programming isn’t just about creatively building interfaces—it also involves many repetitive, tedious tasks. One of these is implementing translations for multilingual applications (i18n). Adding translations for each key in JSON files and then verifying them can be time-consuming and error-prone.

However, AI can significantly speed up this process. Using ChatGPT, DeepSeek, or Claude allows for automatic generation of translations for the user interface, as well as detecting linguistic and stylistic errors.

Example:

We have a translation file in JSON format:

{
  "welcome_message": "Welcome to our application!",
  "logout_button": "Log out",
  "error_message": "Something went wrong. Please try again later."
}

AI can automatically generate its Polish version:

{
  "welcome_message": "Witaj w naszej aplikacji!",
  "logout_button": "Wyloguj się",
  "error_message": "Coś poszło nie tak. Spróbuj ponownie później."
}

Moreover, AI can detect spelling errors or inconsistencies in translations. For example, if one part of the application uses "Log out" and another says "Exit," AI can suggest unifying the terminology.

This type of automation not only saves time but also minimizes the risk of human errors. And this is just one example – AI also assists in generating documentation, writing tests, and optimizing performance, which we will discuss in upcoming articles.

Summary

Artificial intelligence is transforming the way frontend developers work daily. From generating components and refactoring code to detecting errors, automating testing, and documentation—AI significantly accelerates and streamlines the development process. Without these tools, we would lose a lot of valuable time, which we certainly want to avoid.

In the next parts of this series, we will cover topics such as:

Stay tuned to keep up with the latest insights!

The Ultimate Web3 Backend Guide: Supercharge dApps with APIs

Tomasz Dybowski

04 Mar 2025
The Ultimate Web3 Backend Guide: Supercharge dApps with APIs

Introduction

Web3 backend development is essential for building scalable, efficient and decentralized applications (dApps) on EVM-compatible blockchains like Ethereum, Polygon, and Base. A robust Web3 backend enables off-chain computations, efficient data management and better security, ensuring seamless interaction between smart contracts, databases and frontend applications.

Unlike traditional Web2 applications that rely entirely on centralized servers, Web3 applications aim to minimize reliance on centralized entities. However, full decentralization isn't always possible or practical, especially when it comes to high-performance requirements, user authentication or storing large datasets. A well-structured backend in Web3 ensures that these limitations are addressed, allowing for a seamless user experience while maintaining decentralization where it matters most.

Furthermore, dApps require efficient backend solutions to handle real-time data processing, reduce latency, and provide smooth user interactions. Without a well-integrated backend, users may experience delays in transactions, inconsistencies in data retrieval, and inefficiencies in accessing decentralized services. Consequently, Web3 backend development is a crucial component in ensuring a balance between decentralization, security, and functionality.

This article explores:

  • When and why Web3 dApps need a backend
  • Why not all applications should be fully on-chain
  • Architecture examples of hybrid dApps
  • A comparison between APIs and blockchain-based logic

This post kicks off a Web3 backend development series, where we focus on the technical aspects of implementing Web3 backend solutions for decentralized applications.

Why Do Some Web3 Projects Need a Backend?

Web3 applications seek to achieve decentralization, but real-world constraints often necessitate hybrid architectures that include both on-chain and off-chain components. While decentralized smart contracts provide trustless execution, they come with significant limitations, such as high gas fees, slow transaction finality, and the inability to store large amounts of data. A backend helps address these challenges by handling logic and data management more efficiently while still ensuring that core transactions remain secure and verifiable on-chain.

Moreover, Web3 applications must consider user experience. Fully decentralized applications often struggle with slow transaction speeds, which can negatively impact usability. A hybrid backend allows for pre-processing operations off-chain while committing final results to the blockchain. This ensures that users experience fast and responsive interactions without compromising security and transparency.

While decentralization is a core principle of blockchain technology, many dApps still rely on a Web2-style backend for practical reasons:

1. Performance & Scalability in Web3 Backend Development

  • Smart contracts are expensive to execute and require gas fees for every interaction.
  • Offloading non-essential computations to a backend reduces costs and improves performance.
  • Caching and load balancing mechanisms in traditional backends ensure smooth dApp performance and improve response times for dApp users.
  • Event-driven architectures using tools like Redis or Kafka can help manage asynchronous data processing efficiently.

2. Web3 APIs for Data Storage and Off-Chain Access

  • Storing large amounts of data on-chain is impractical due to high costs.
  • APIs allow dApps to store & fetch off-chain data (e.g. user profiles, transaction history).
  • Decentralized storage solutions like IPFS, Arweave and Filecoin can be used for storing immutable data (e.g. NFT metadata), but a Web2 backend helps with indexing and querying structured data efficiently.

3. Advanced Logic & Data Aggregation in Web3 Backend

  • Some dApps need complex business logic that is inefficient or impossible to implement in a smart contract.
  • Backend APIs allow for data aggregation from multiple sources, including oracles (e.g. Chainlink) and off-chain databases.
  • Middleware solutions like The Graph help in indexing blockchain data efficiently, reducing the need for on-chain computation.

4. User Authentication & Role Management in Web3 dApps

  • Many applications require user logins, permissions or KYC compliance.
  • Blockchain does not natively support session-based authentication, requiring a backend for handling this logic.
  • Tools like Firebase Auth, Auth0 or Web3Auth can be used to integrate seamless authentication for Web3 applications.

5. Cost Optimization with Web3 APIs

  • Every change in a smart contract requires a new audit, costing tens of thousands of dollars.
  • By handling logic off-chain where possible, projects can minimize expensive redeployments.
  • Using layer 2 solutions like Optimism, Arbitrum and zkSync can significantly reduce gas costs.

Web3 Backend Development: Tools and Technologies

A modern Web3 backend integrates multiple tools to handle smart contract interactions, data storage, and security. Understanding these tools is crucial to developing a scalable and efficient backend for dApps. Without the right stack, developers may face inefficiencies, security risks, and scaling challenges that limit the adoption of their Web3 applications.

Unlike traditional backend development, Web3 requires additional considerations, such as decentralized authentication, smart contract integration, and secure data management across both on-chain and off-chain environments.

Here’s an overview of the essential Web3 backend tech stack:

1. API Development for Web3 Backend Services

  • Node.js is the go-to backend runtime good for Web3 applications due to its asynchronous event-driven architecture.
  • NestJS is a framework built on top of Node.js, providing modular architecture and TypeScript support for structured backend development.

2. Smart Contract Interaction Libraries for Web3 Backend

  • Ethers.js and Web3.js are TypeScript/JavaScript libraries used for interacting with Ethereum-compatible blockchains.

3. Database Solutions for Web3 Backend

  • PostgreSQL: Structured database used for storing off-chain transactional data.
  • MongoDB: NoSQL database for flexible schema data storage.
  • Firebase: A set of tools used, among other things, for user authentication.
  • The Graph: Decentralized indexing protocol used to query blockchain data efficiently.

4. Cloud Services and Hosting for Web3 APIs

When It Doesn't Make Sense to Go Fully On-Chain

Decentralization is valuable, but it comes at a cost. Fully on-chain applications suffer from performance limitations, high costs and slow execution speeds. For many use cases, a hybrid Web3 architecture that utilizes a mix of blockchain-based and off-chain components provides a more scalable and cost-effective solution.

In some cases, forcing full decentralization is unnecessary and inefficient. A hybrid Web3 architecture balances decentralization and practicality by allowing non-essential logic and data storage to be handled off-chain while maintaining trustless and verifiable interactions on-chain.

The key challenge when designing a hybrid Web3 backend is ensuring that off-chain computations remain auditable and transparent. This can be achieved through cryptographic proofs, hash commitments and off-chain data attestations that anchor trust into the blockchain while improving efficiency.

For example, Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups allow computations to happen off-chain while only submitting finalized data to Ethereum, reducing fees and increasing throughput. Similarly, state channels enable fast, low-cost transactions that only require occasional settlement on-chain.

A well-balanced Web3 backend architecture ensures that critical dApp functionalities remain decentralized while offloading resource-intensive tasks to off-chain systems. This makes applications cheaper, faster and more user-friendly while still adhering to blockchain's principles of transparency and security.

Example: NFT-based Game with Off-Chain Logic

Imagine a Web3 game where users buy, trade and battle NFT-based characters. While asset ownership should be on-chain, other elements like:

  • Game logic (e.g., matchmaking, leaderboard calculations)
  • User profiles & stats
  • Off-chain notifications

can be handled off-chain to improve speed and cost-effectiveness.

Architecture Diagram

Below is an example diagram showing how a hybrid Web3 application splits responsibilities between backend and blockchain components.

Hybrid Web3 Architecture

Comparing Web3 Backend APIs vs. Blockchain-Based Logic

FeatureWeb3 Backend (API)Blockchain (Smart Contracts)
Change ManagementCan be updated easilyEvery change requires a new contract deployment
CostTraditional hosting feesHigh gas fees + costly audits
Data StorageCan store large datasetsLimited and expensive storage
SecuritySecure but relies on centralized infrastructureFully decentralized & trustless
PerformanceFast response timesLimited by blockchain throughput

Reducing Web3 Costs with AI Smart Contract Audit

One of the biggest pain points in Web3 development is the cost of smart contract audits. Each change to the contract code requires a new audit, often costing tens of thousands of dollars.

To address this issue, Nextrope is developing an AI-powered smart contract auditing tool, which:

  • Reduces audit costs by automating code analysis.
  • Speeds up development cycles by catching vulnerabilities early.
  • Improves security by providing quick feedback.

This AI-powered solution will be a game-changer for the industry, making smart contract development more cost-effective and accessible.

Conclusion

Web3 backend development plays a crucial role in scalable and efficient dApps. While full decentralization is ideal in some cases, many projects benefit from a hybrid architecture, where off-chain components optimize performance, reduce costs and improve user experience.

In future posts in this Web3 backend series, we’ll explore specific implementation details, including:

  • How to design a Web3 API for dApps
  • Best practices for integrating backend services
  • Security challenges and solutions

Stay tuned for the next article in this series!