Application born from frustration

Maciej Zieliński

11 Dec 2019
Application born from frustration
Julia Wolińska

Several dozen years ago, making purchases with a debit card was just a dream on the Polish market; without a wad of cash making a bigger transaction was futile. A dozen years ago, making a money transfer was preceded by a lengthy authorisation process. The frustration connected with a trip to one of the few available bank agencies was only surpassed by the one caused by standing in a long queue in a hospital. Several years ago, in order to pay while abroad, we needed to equip ourselves with a massive amount of cash in a currency exchange bureau. That is, unless we wished to face a costly currency conversion fees in the bank

How come then, that in a matter of several seasons we learned to uninstall payment apps if they do notfit our visual criteria? For banks and start-ups this is not a mere requirement, but a chance. The discussion concerning the “beauty contest” for the financial apps is more vivid than ever. UX (User Experience) and UI (User Interface) are bound to become a distinguishing factor in the era of PSD2 directive. Where does the success lie? Today, we are going to compare three different ways of designing the UX and UI in the financial apps.

The difference lies in the Fintechs

Financial services based on the information technology are experiencing their boom, though the specialists agree that it’s just the beginning. In the last year, only in the United States there has been a significant increase in the revenue of the fintech companies, even reaching the impressive 43% in reference to the prior year which translates into an incredible growth by 12.4 billion dollars. All it tookwas one year.

Not only are the modern solutions simpler, more comfortable and safer than those which previous generations got used to, but they are also far more personalized and nicer to use. It’s the app interfaces,credit cards and modern solutions which are meticulously prepared and tailored for the needs of the present-day user which stand behind the successes of the popularity of fintechs like “Revolut” or “N26Wygoda”.

It’s the comfort and the elegance of the utility which triumphed even over the superstitions against the payment with our phones. The fintechs have shown us a different way and they made a basis for a better standard.

Demands of the spoiled Millennials... or the visionary call for a change?

Together with the development of the modern technologies, the demands of the users of mobile devices have increased. We can criticize the current generation of young adults for being too reliant onpersonal comfort, but we can conjointly agree that their cries for an improvement has benefited us all. Online banking and payment systems have stopped being only utility based; they have become an aesthetic and enjoyable experience. We have reached a situation where the amount of savings on our credit card or the financial app is not the only signifier of prestige.

Thinking different about the UX/UI of financial services

Design is just the tip of an iceberg if its coincidental. Most companies need a fresh approach to create new products or improve the existing ones. Nothing illustrates it better than the Apple Card. When weare holding the card in our hands, we realise that its visually appealing and it has many interesting utilities, however this perception is too shallow.

It’s fascinating that Apple, unlike any other company is capable of doing the same thing so effectively. They combine known features without adding anything which is normally deemed necessary and then make a value proposition from it. The critics look down upon the card, saying that it lacks the NFC service. However, the piece of titanium with Goldman Sachs sign written over it, was never meant to be used for the contactless payment. You need to use it in the hotels reception, show it after the luxurious meal in the restaurant. You will do that, despite receiving a lower cashback than by using a phone to pay. The companies underestimate the power of beauty and prestige behind their products. Apple has created a better card than any other company not because it was innovative, but because it’s a product tailored towards their very own customer. The company perfectly reads their own clients when it realises that their needs lie in the sensation and feel of the aesthetic prestige.

Revolut – fintech technologies which molded the european market

One of the major pioneers that revolutionized the payment system is Revolut. Fintech was introduced to the Polish market in 2017 and it definitely won the hearts of our countrymen. While the banks are swearing that everything is under their control, the start-up has announced that they reached their first million of clients.

After the introduction of Revolut, many of the comforts it offered were revolutionary in Polish perception. Suddenly, we started using the foreign currency accounts which always used the beneficialconversion rates. Creating a new bank account suddenly became a cakewalk, unlike what was offered by our native banks, because of the well-rounded, neatly organised UI and UX of the app. The verification process is swiftly handled by the KYC procedures; thanks to them it took only one evening for our account to be made. The card arrived to the recipient only after a few business days. All without the damaged envelopes and redundant terms of service written in an unidentified legal terminology. All it took was a simple, elegant container which reminded the recipient of the Apple designs. Simplicity and enjoyment was the key, unlike the wonky CX (Customer Experience) of the bank accounts.

In the first half of 2018 there were 1.7 million financial start up clients and after only a year the number has grown to almost 4 million.

UX/UI design lessons from the Revolut

The advantage of Revolut wasn’t solely made by the ease of account creation or the free card distribution. Its success was decided by well thought and planned design. The clear and easy to read login screen (which can be unlocked by the usage of fingerprints or the personal code), easily readable main page and intuitive marking, everything is in touch with the key rules of UI design. The user is not distracted by the unnecessary visual elements. Big, contrasting key icons lead you to the most important functions such as making a wire transfer or checking the transaction story. What’s important is that Revolut has designed his app around the responsive grid which is following the rules of Material Design. It allows for optimal utilisation of the app no matter what resolution is allowed by the size of your mobile device.

It’s an art of designing a simple app. Revolut is minimalist but cosy and visually appealing, and unlike its rival apps it doesn’t come off as a cheap knock off. Even the simplest icon placement can make a huge difference in the art of designing the financial app

To design a newsletter

The communication with the clients is a cherry on top in establishing a good financial app. Bland, repetitive newsletters are often soulless automated responses which are sent to thousands of clients. Adaptation to the newest trends in the field of effective marketing allowed fintech to create an illusion that it doesn’t have to be that way. Its not a handwritten letter, but enough to keep the modern recipientengaged. Following the design notes of the app, we are faced with an easily readable, simple CTA, coherent design of keys or well refined microcopy. The elements are repeatable, which makes the user utilize the app instinctively after getting a hold of it. A coherent colour code reduces the reaction time to minimum. “Straight to the point”- this strategy of the brands language creates a sense of security, because the communication with the company feels sincere and accessible.

Fintech solutions in Polish banks

The trend was quickly picked up by our native banks. For the last several years they focused on optimising the payment procedures and the UX/UI of the mobile devices. Its not surprising as over 9 million of Poles have claimed that they are using the financial apps. However, finding the balance between the minimalism and utility of the interface is the biggest problem yet for the designers.

What is more, a well balanced app of the financial start-up or bank is that which is more readable and user friendly than native apps of the social medias. Now we are going to compare three methods of designing the UX and UI.

mBanks’ innovative mobile app

The clients usually do not take their time to time analyse the banking apps, unlike us of course. mBankcreated an app which, at first glance, meets all the modern design notes in the field of UI and UX.

Instead of trying to bombard the user with features, we receive clear section with consistent colouring. Not only can you easily make your money transfer, but also you can easily access the transaction story. The app is highly responsive on pretty much every single mobile device, the optimisation level will satisfy even the tablet users.

The most important icons are easily reachable by your thumb, they lie in a so-called “thumb zone”, which unfortunately isn’t the standard yet. The app was also designed on a clear grid, and the buttons generally follow the standard dimensions of 44x44 which is the size which is deemed the most comfortable to press on the screen.

There are two main reasons why you are clicking your banking app: to check your accounts’ balance and to make a money transfer. In mBank, the balance is the first, most visible element upon logging in.With only three quick clicks you can access the app and make your money transfer. The most important button which allows you to do so covers most of the space of the screen and has a bright, easily distinguishable colour.

PKO- world’s leading app design

If you want to insult a banker, tell him that the Polish banking system is out of touch and redundant. Consecutive competitions are proving that it’s just a harmful, slandering label. The IKO app which belongs to PKO Bank Polski was nominated as the best banking app... in the world! Twice in a row! This wondrous utility is used by almost 4 million people.

The tests easily show why the app is so highly regarded. A clear interface held in a toned down colour scheme allows you to access the most important functions without breaking a sweat.

The app takes full advantage of the technological advancements and innovation. Paying is made much easier because of the ability to scan a special code to make the transaction immediately. The IKO design doesn’t utilise micro interactions, animations and it doesn’t overwhelm the user with fancy decorations. However, this doesn’t mean the design is lacking in any way, the app was planned to be targeted at every eligible age group. The app is far more readable for the elderly age groups, because itcorresponds to the desktop version far more than any other banking app. Its apparent that mobile banking is not only used by the millennials.

The most commonly used functions, like making the money transfer were highlighted with a contrasting blue colour. The size of the buttons doesn’t suggest you the hierarchy of the choice of actions. Even before checking the app out, we suspected that it will have a standard hamburger menu, situated on the upper left corner. It’s a typical technique when we want to enforce a safe design which can be easily readable by every type of user

Credit Agricole, French elegance and... the very first dark mode

Messenger, iOS, Slack... each and every one of those app utilises the dark mode, which has become the leading standard in the design of the mobile apps. The mobile app of Credit Agricole follows a much different approach towards the design of UI than the IKO app. It’s much more different when compared to its desktop version.

Half-transparent buttons, elegant and minimalist design of the icons, micro interactions and micro animations all contribute to great enjoyment in learning and using the app. Of course at first its going to be a little puzzling for the older audience and the people who are less versed in the world of mobile goodies. The advanced features are hidden in the interface, so while the app seems simple, there is more than meets the eye here. What’s interesting, Credit Agricole doesn’t force the choice of options onto its user. The money transfer, transaction history or the recipient list icons have the same size and coloration. The most distinctive element of the hamburger menu is the “my products” options which isdeemed the most important and so it’s the easiest one to locate. However, the thumb-zone of the app islimited by the icons situated in the upper corner of the app. Had they been placed in the more accessible space, the app could be used entirely with your thumb.

Well designed UX/UI is a key to success!

intech is about to experience a very intense, yet productive period. We will be able to choose from many different ways of how to design the mobile apps revolving around the domain of banking. We will surely witness the rise of humble start-ups which are going to take the world of mobile banking bya storm. We will be capable of creating an enjoyable experience for millions of mobile users which will be tailored to their needs. We are faced with a chance of reimagining the once unpleasant chore of interaction with the bank into an enjoyable, easily accessible experience.

After all, designing a marvellous UX and UI is a part of designing a positive experience of any mobile user!

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

How NOT to Create a DAO: Common Pitfalls You Should Avoid

Kajetan Olas

27 Dec 2024
How NOT to Create a DAO: Common Pitfalls You Should Avoid

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) represent a fundamental shift in how communities, companies, and initiatives can coordinate efforts, funds, and decisions on the blockchain. By leveraging transparent smart contracts and on-chain governance mechanisms, DAOs aim to distribute authority, reduce overhead, and foster a more democratic decision-making process. However, building a successful DAO isn’t just about cutting-edge tech or grand ideas—it also requires a clear vision, well-crafted governance rules, and a strategically engaged community.

In this article, we’ll take a counterintuitive approach by highlighting how not to create a DAO. By focusing on common pitfalls—from legal oversights to governance missteps—we can better understand what truly contributes to a thriving, sustainable DAO. This perspective aligns with the importance of recognizing cognitive biases, such as insensitivity to base rates and the conjunction fallacy, which often lead enthusiastic founders to overlook real-world data and complexity. Avoiding these traps can be the difference between launching a resilient DAO and watching an ambitious project crumble under misaligned structures or unmet expectations.

2. Missing the Governance Threshold Mark

Governance Thresholds Gone Wrong

Governance thresholds dictate how many votes or what percentage of voting power is needed to pass a proposal within a DAO. Striking the right balance here is crucial. Thresholds that are set too high can stifle progress by making it nearly impossible for proposals to succeed, effectively discouraging member participation. On the other hand, thresholds that are too low can lead to frivolous proposals or constant voting spam, making governance more of a burden than a benefit.

When designing your DAO’s thresholds, consider:

  • Community size and engagement levels: Larger communities might handle higher thresholds more comfortably, while smaller groups may benefit from lower requirements to encourage active participation.
  • Type of proposals: Operational decisions may need a lower threshold, whereas critical changes (such as tokenomics or treasury management) often require more consensus.
  • Voter fatigue: The more frequently members are asked to vote—and if it’s too easy to put forward proposals—the greater the risk of apathy or disengagement.

Over-Complex vs. Over-Simplified Governance

It’s tempting to either pile on complicated governance rules or oversimplify them to keep decision-making quick. However, both extremes can be problematic. Simplicity in governance is key to enhancing clarity and participation. Overly complex smart contracts and procedural layers can dissuade newcomers from getting involved, while an oversimplified model might fail to address potential conflicts or security vulnerabilities.

Some issues to watch out for:

  • Complex Smart Contracts: More code means more potential bugs and greater difficulty in auditing or updating governance logic.
  • Opaque Voting Processes: If members can’t easily understand how votes are tallied or how proposals are introduced, engagement drops.
  • Excessive Centralization in “Simple” Models: In trying to streamline governance, some DAOs inadvertently concentrate power in the hands of a few decision-makers.

Ultimately, aiming for a balanced governance framework—one that is easy enough for members to participate in but comprehensive enough to protect the DAO from abuse—is central to avoiding the pitfalls of governance threshold mismanagement.

3. Underestimating Legal and Regulatory Aspects

Legal Wrappers and Compliance

Building a DAO without considering legal and regulatory frameworks is a common recipe for disaster. While decentralization is a powerful concept, it doesn’t absolve projects from potential liabilities and compliance obligations. Assigning your DAO a formal legal wrapper—whether it’s a foundation, a cooperative, an LLC, or another entity type—can help mitigate personal risks for contributors and align your organization with existing regulatory regimes.

Failing to think through these details often leads to:

  • Personal Liability for Founders: Without a proper legal entity, core contributors might become personally responsible for any legal disputes or financial mishaps involving the DAO.
  • Regulatory Crackdowns: Governing bodies worldwide are actively monitoring DAOs for compliance with securities laws, anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, and tax obligations. Ignoring these can lead to penalties, fines, or forced shutdowns.

Non-Existent or Inadequate Documentation

Equally problematic is the lack of clear documentation outlining the DAO’s legal structure and operational protocols. From voting procedures to treasury management, every aspect of the DAO’s lifecycle should be properly documented to reduce ambiguity and help new members understand their responsibilities. Inadequate documentation or outright neglect can create:

  • Confusion Over Roles and Responsibilities: Without explicit definitions, it’s easy for tasks to fall through the cracks or for disagreements to escalate.
  • Inability to Enforce Rules: DAOs rely on both smart contracts and social consensus. Formalizing rules in documentation helps ensure consistent enforcement and prevents unwelcome surprises.

In short, underestimating the legal dimension of DAO creation can derail even the most innovative projects. By proactively addressing legal and regulatory considerations—and maintaining thorough documentation—you not only protect core contributors but also fortify trust within your community and with external stakeholders.

Overlooking Community Building

The Importance of Community Engagement

A DAO, at its core, is nothing without an active and supportive community. Driving grassroots enthusiasm and participation is often the deciding factor between a thriving DAO and one that fizzles out. Yet, it’s surprisingly easy to underestimate just how vital it is to nurture community trust and engagement—especially during the early stages.

Some common pitfalls include:

  • Treating Community Members as Passive Observers
    Instead of viewing your community as a dynamic force, you might slip into a one-way communication style. This discourages members from taking initiative or contributing fresh ideas.
  • Lack of Clear Roles and Channels
    Without well-defined roles and open communication channels—like forums, Discord servers, or governance platforms—members can feel confused about where to participate or how to add value.
  • Ignoring Early Feedback
    In a DAO, the “wisdom of the crowd” can be a powerful asset. Overlooking or trivializing user feedback can lead to missed opportunities for innovation and improvement.

Failing to Incentivize Properly

Well-structured incentives lie at the heart of any successful DAO. Whether you’re offering governance tokens, staking rewards, or recognition badges, these incentives must be aligned with the DAO’s long-term goals. Misalignment often causes short-sighted behavior, where participants chase quick rewards rather than contributing meaningfully.

  • Overemphasis on Token Speculation
    If the primary draw for community members is the promise of quick token price gains, you risk attracting speculators instead of builders. This can lead to fleeting participation and sell-offs at the first sign of trouble.
  • Neglecting Non-Monetary Rewards
    Recognition, social standing, and meaningful collaboration can be just as powerful as financial incentives. When a DAO fails to provide pathways for skill development or leadership, member engagement wanes.
  • Cognitive Bias Traps
    Biases such as the conjunction fallacy can mislead founders into believing that if multiple positive outcomes are possible (e.g., rising token prices, active participation, mainstream adoption), then all those outcomes will inevitably happen together. This wishful thinking can blind DAOs to the need for thoughtful, data-driven incentive models.

To avoid these pitfalls, DAO creators must actively foster a culture of transparency, collaboration, and mutual respect. By setting clear expectations, leveraging diverse incentive structures, and consistently involving community feedback, you ensure members are motivated to contribute more than just their votes—they become co-creators in the DAO’s shared vision.

5. Ignoring Technical Considerations

Token Standards and Governance Frameworks

A solid technical foundation is essential when you create a DAO, particularly if it involves on-chain governance. Selecting the appropriate token standards and governance frameworks can significantly impact your DAO’s security, efficiency, and scalability.

Some pitfalls to watch out for include:

  • Choosing Incompatible Token Standards
    If your DAO relies on a token that isn’t easily integrated with governance contracts or lacks upgradeability, you might face roadblocks when implementing new features or patching vulnerabilities.
  • Underestimating Smart Contract Complexity
    Even “simple” governance tokens can hide complex logic behind the scenes. Overlooking these complexities may result in bugs, lockouts, or exploits that harm the DAO’s reputation and finances.
  • Ignoring Off-Chain vs. On-Chain Dynamics
    Governance strategies often combine on-chain decisions with off-chain discussions (e.g., using platforms like Discord or forums). Failing to synchronize these two spheres can fracture community engagement and hamper decision-making.

Poor Architecture and Security

Robust security isn’t just about preventing hacks—it's about building an architecture that can adapt to evolving threats and changing community needs.

Key oversights include:

  • Inadequate Auditing
    Smart contracts require thorough reviews, both automated and manual. Rushing to mainnet deployment without proper audits can lead to major losses—financial, reputational, or both.
  • No Contingency Plans
    If a vulnerability is discovered, how will you respond? Lacking emergency procedures or fallback governance mechanisms can leave a DAO paralyzed when critical decisions must be made quickly.
  • Over-Engineered Solutions
    While security is paramount, over-complicating the DAO’s architecture can create unintended vulnerabilities. Keeping your setup as simple as possible reduces attack surfaces and makes it easier for community members to understand and trust the system.

In short, technical considerations form the bedrock of a functional DAO. Choosing appropriate token standards, thoroughly auditing contracts, and designing for both present-day and future needs are non-negotiable steps in avoiding costly pitfalls.

Best Practices and Lessons

When studying successful DAOs, certain themes emerge time and again. According to Aragon the most robust DAOs share a commitment to simplicity, iteration, and transparent governance. Instead of rolling out overly sophisticated models from day one, they evolve and adapt based on community feedback and real-world performance.

Here are a few best practices worth emulating:

  • Iterative Approach to Governance
    Start small and build up. Launch a Minimal Viable DAO (MVD) to test voting processes, incentive mechanisms, and proposal management. Gather community feedback and refine before taking bigger steps.
  • Simple, Transparent Rules and Processes
    Ensure proposals are easy to understand and that the voting process is accessible to all token holders. Overly complicated frameworks can dissuade new members from participating.
  • Clear Roles and Shared Responsibilities
    Define contributor and community member roles early on. Whether you rely on working groups, committees, or elected leaders, clarity prevents power vacuums and fosters collaboration.
  • Open Communication and Education
    From Discord channels to public documentation, keep conversation and learning at the heart of your DAO. Encourage members to ask questions, propose improvements, and take leadership roles.

Academic Perspectives

Beyond practical experience, a growing body of research offers theoretical insights that can strengthen DAO governance. The discusses emerging patterns in DAOs, including how incentives and on-chain rules interact with off-chain social dynamics. By examining these findings, DAO creators can better anticipate challenges—like voter apathy, whale influence, or collusion—and integrate solutions from the outset.

Incorporating academic perspectives can help:

  • Validate Governance Assumptions
    Empirical data and rigorous analyses can confirm or challenge the assumptions behind your DAO’s architecture, preventing costly mistakes.
  • Stay Ahead of Regulatory and Social Shifts
    Academics often explore how upcoming policies or societal trends might impact DAOs, offering a forward-looking lens that day-to-day builders might miss.
  • Establish Credibility
    Aligning your DAO’s structure and operations with recognized research signals professionalism and thoroughness, potentially attracting more serious contributors, partners, and investors.

Conclusion

As you can see, creating a DAO involves more than just deploying a smart contract and distributing tokens. By examining these common pitfalls—from poor governance thresholds to inadequate legal structures, from neglecting community engagement to disregarding technical complexities—you gain a clearer picture of what not to do when you set out to create a DAO. Failing to address these areas often leads to compromised security, stalled decision-making, regulatory headaches, or outright community collapse

At Nextrope, we specialize in tailored blockchain and cryptocurrency solutions, including DAO creation and tokenomics design. If you’re looking to avoid these common pitfalls and build a thriving DAO that stands the test of time, feel free to contact us or explore more resources on our blog.

Quadratic Voting in Web3

Kajetan Olas

04 Dec 2024
Quadratic Voting in Web3

Decentralized systems are reshaping how we interact, conduct transactions, and govern online communities. As Web3 continues to advance, the necessity for effective and fair voting mechanisms becomes apparent. Traditional voting systems, such as the one-token-one-vote model, often fall short in capturing the intensity of individual preferences, which can result in centralization. Quadratic Voting (QV) addresses this challenge by enabling individuals to express not only their choices but also the strength of their preferences.

In QV, voters are allocated a budget of credits that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The cost of casting multiple votes on a single issue increases quadratically, meaning that each additional vote costs more than the last. This system allows for a more precise expression of preferences, as individuals can invest more heavily in issues they care deeply about while conserving credits on matters of lesser importance.

Understanding Quadratic Voting

Quadratic Voting (QV) is a voting system designed to capture not only the choices of individuals but also the strength of their preferences. In most DAO voting mechanisms, each person typically has one vote per token, which limits the ability to express how strongly they feel about a particular matter. Furthermore, QV limits the power of whales and founding team who typically have large token allocations. These problems are adressed by making the cost of each additional vote increase quadratically.

In QV, each voter is given a budget of credits or tokens that they can spend to cast votes on various issues. The key principle is that the cost to cast n votes on a single issue is proportional to the square of n. This quadratic cost function ensures that while voters can express stronger preferences, doing so requires a disproportionately higher expenditure of their voting credits. This mechanism discourages voters from concentrating all their influence on a single issue unless they feel very strongly about it. In the context of DAOs, it means that large holders will have a hard-time pushing through with a proposal if they'll try to do it on their own.

Practical Example

Consider a voter who has been allocated 25 voting credits to spend on several proposals. The voter has varying degrees of interest in three proposals: Proposal A, Proposal B, and Proposal C.

  • Proposal A: High interest.
  • Proposal B: Moderate interest.
  • Proposal C: Low interest.

The voter might allocate their credits as follows:

Proposal A:

  • Votes cast: 3
  • Cost: 9 delegated tokens

Proposal B:

  • Votes cast: 2
  • Cost: 4 delegated tokens

Proposal C:

  • Votes cast: 1
  • Cost: 1 delegated token

Total delegated tokens: 14
Remaining tokens: 11

With the remaining tokens, the voter can choose to allocate additional votes to the proposals based on their preferences or save for future proposals. If they feel particularly strong about Proposal A, they might decide to cast one more vote:

Additional vote on Proposal A:

  • New total votes: 4
  • New cost: 16 delegated tokens
  • Additional cost: 16−9 = 7 delegated tokens

Updated total delegated tokens: 14+7 = 21

Updated remaining tokens: 25−21 = 425 - 21 = 4

This additional vote on Proposal A costs 7 credits, significantly more than the previous vote, illustrating how the quadratic cost discourages excessive influence on a single issue without strong conviction.

Benefits of Implementing Quadratic Voting

Key Characteristics of the Quadratic Cost Function

  • Marginal Cost Increases Linearly: The marginal cost of each additional vote increases linearly. The cost difference between casting n and n−1 votes is 2n−1.
  • Total Cost Increases Quadratically: The total cost to cast multiple votes rises steeply, discouraging voters from concentrating too many votes on a single issue without significant reason.
  • Promotes Egalitarian Voting: Small voters are encouraged to participate, because relatively they have a much higher impact.

Advantages Over Traditional Voting Systems

Quadratic Voting offers several benefits compared to traditional one-person-one-vote systems:

  • Captures Preference Intensity: By allowing voters to express how strongly they feel about an issue, QV leads to outcomes that better reflect the collective welfare.
  • Reduces Majority Domination: The quadratic cost makes it costly for majority groups to overpower minority interests on every issue.
  • Encourages Honest Voting: Voters are incentivized to allocate votes in proportion to their true preferences, reducing manipulation.

By understanding the foundation of Quadratic Voting, stakeholders in Web3 communities can appreciate how this system supports more representative governance.

Conclusion

Quadratic voting is a novel voting system that may be used within DAOs to foster decentralization. The key idea is to make the cost of voting on a certain issue increase quadratically. The leading player that makes use of this mechanism is Optimism. If you're pondering about the design of your DAO, we highly recommend taking a look at their research on quadratic funding.

If you're looking to create a robust governance model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure that your DAO will stand out as a beacon of innovation and resilience in the long term.