Chainlink vs Polkadot

Karolina

08 Feb 2024
Chainlink vs Polkadot

Chainlink aims to securely bridge the gap between blockchains and real-world data through its Decentralized Oracle network. On the other hand, Polkadot focuses on enabling different blockchains to transfer messages and value trust-free, enhancing interoperability. This article delves into the distinctions between Chainlink and Polkadot, shedding light on their purposes, technologies, and the potential impacts they have on the blockchain ecosystem.

What is Chainlink?

Chainlink

Chainlink is a decentralized oracle network designed to provide external data to smart contracts on any blockchain. Recognizing the limitation that smart contracts cannot natively access external data, Chainlink offers a solution by acting as a reliable bridge. Oracles in the Chainlink network collect and verify external data from various sources, ensuring the data's integrity before feeding it into smart contracts. This mechanism enables smart contracts to execute based on real-world events, data, and API information, which is crucial for the development of dynamic and responsive blockchain applications. Chainlink's key features include:

  • Decentralization. Ensuring data integrity and reducing reliance on any single point of failure by utilizing a network of independent node operators.
  • Security. Advanced cryptographic techniques and a robust reputation system safeguard the network against manipulation and ensure the reliability of data.
  • Flexibility. Compatibility with any blockchain allows seamless integration across diverse ecosystems.

Chainlink's use cases span across finance, insurance, gaming, and many other sectors, where access to accurate and timely external data is critical.

MUST READ: "What is Chainlink"

What is Polkadot?

Polkadot

Polkadot is a multi-chain framework that facilitates the cross-chain transfer of any data or asset types, not just tokens, thereby enabling interoperability among blockchains. It consists of a main network called the Relay Chain and multiple parachains are individual blockchains that connect to and secured by the Relay Chain. This unique architecture allows for a high degree of customization and scalability, as each parachain can be tailored to specific use cases or workloads while benefiting from the shared security of the Relay Chain.

Polkadot's key features include:

  • Interoperability. Enables different blockchains to communicate and transfer data or assets in a trust-free environment, opening up cross-chain applications and services.
  • Scalability. Parachains operate in parallel, allowing for significant scalability improvements over traditional blockchain architectures.
  • Shared Security. Parachains share the security model of the Relay Chain, ensuring that they benefit from a collective security mechanism rather than having to create their own.

The vision behind Polkadot is to create a fully interoperable and scalable web of blockchains, facilitating the seamless exchange of information and transactions across previously siloed networks. This approach not only enhances efficiency and scalability but also encourages innovation by allowing developers to focus on building specialized solutions on parachains.

MUST READ: "Polkadot – Blockchain to change the rules of the game?"

Chainlink vs Polkadot: Understanding the Differences

Purpose and Focus

Chainlink's Purpose

Chainlink focuses enhancing the functionality of smart contracts by providing them with access to real-world data. This is achieved through its decentralized oracle network, which ensures that the data smart contracts rely on for their execution is accurate and reliable. Chainlink's aim is to bridge the gap between the on-chain and off-chain worlds, enabling smart contracts to interact with external data feeds, web APIs, and traditional bank payment systems securely.

Polkadot, on the other hand, solves the problem of blockchain interoperability and scalability. Its unique multi-chain framework allows different blockchains to communicate and share information without sacrificing their sovereignty. By enabling the transfer of data and value between previously incompatible networks, Polkadot seeks to create a web of interconnected blockchains, facilitating a new level of interoperability and scalability.

Chainlink's Focus

Technology and Infrastructure

Chainlink's infrastructure revolves around its decentralized network of oracles, which independently collect, verify, and deliver external data to blockchain smart contracts. This setup ensures that the data is not only accurate but also resistant to manipulation, providing a secure and trustworthy environment for smart contracts to operate in.

Polkadot's architecture is based on a central Relay Chain and multiple parachains (parallel chains). The Relay Chain is responsible for the network's shared security, consensus, and interoperability, while parachains are individual blockchains that can have their own tokens and be optimized for specific use cases. This design allows for a high degree of customization and scalability across the Polkadot network.

MUST READ: "Developing Blockchain Interoperability Solutions with Cosmos and Polkadot"

Use Cases - Chainlink vs Polkadot

Chainlink's oracles are critical for any application that requires real-world data to trigger smart contract execution. This includes, but is not limited to, decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms that need up-to-date price feeds, insurance contracts that depend on real-world events, and gaming platforms that utilize external data for in-game mechanics.

Polkadot focuses on enabling different blockchains to work together seamlessly. Its use cases are broad and include cross-chain transfers of data or assets, interoperable applications that can operate over multiple blockchains, and the creation of new types of services that leverage the strengths of various networks without being limited by the weaknesses of any single chain.

Chainlink vs Polkadot

FeatureChainlinkPolkadot
SecuritySecures data pipeline with decentralized oracles and cryptographic proofs.Shared security model through the Relay Chain, benefiting all parachains.
ScalabilityEnhances application scalability by off-chain data interaction.Handles high transaction volumes with parallel processing of parachains.
GovernanceDecentralized governance involving community, node operators, and Chainlink team.On-chain governance model allowing token holder proposals and voting.
AdoptionWidespread in DeFi and various industries for real-time data needs.Adopted for diverse use cases across its growing number of parachains.
EcosystemComprises independent node operators, data providers, and developers.Includes projects developing on parachains, infrastructure providers, and a supportive community.
Chainlink vs Polkadot

Security

  • Chainlink emphasizes securing the data pipeline between external data sources and blockchain smart contracts. It uses a decentralized network of oracles to prevent single points of failure and ensure data integrity.
  • Polkadot focuses on the security of its multi-chain architecture through shared security. This means that all parachains benefit from the collective security of the Polkadot network, provided by the Relay Chain. This shared security model ensures that individual blockchains do not need to establish their own security measures, which can be resource-intensive and less effective.

Scalability

  • Chainlink makes smart contracts smarter. It connects them to the real world without slowing down. This means more complex apps can run smoothly.
  • Polkadot uses many chains at once. It’s like opening more lanes on a highway. This lets more data flow quickly. Each chain does its part, keeping things fast.

Governance

  • In Chainlink, decisions come from many. The community, those running nodes, and the Chainlink team all have a voice. This way, changes benefit everyone.
  • Polkadot's governance is hands-on. Token holders vote on proposals. They shape Polkadot's future directly. It’s democracy in action, ensuring the network evolves as a true community.

Chainlink vs Polkadot - Conclusion

Chainlink and Polkadot are at the forefront of blockchain innovation, each serving distinct yet complementary roles. Chainlink's secure data integration expands the utility of smart contracts, while Polkadot's focus on interoperability and scalability fosters a more connected blockchain ecosystem. Their unique approaches contribute significantly to the blockchain community, driving growth and attracting a wide range of stakeholders.

If you are interested in utilizing Chainlink or other blockchain-based solutions for your project, please reach out to contact@nextrope.com

FAQ

How does Chainlink ensure data reliability for smart contracts?

  • Chainlink employs a decentralized oracle network to verify external data before feeding it into smart contracts.

What's the architectural difference between Chainlink and Polkadot?

  • Chainlink uses a network of oracles, whereas Polkadot consists of a Relay Chain and parachains for shared security and scalability.

What additional use cases can Chainlink and Polkadot serve?

  • Chainlink: Supply chain verification, weather insurance, prediction markets.
  • Polkadot: Cross-border payments, IoT device connectivity.

How do Chainlink and Polkadot handle governance?

  • Chainlink involves community, node operators, and the Chainlink team.
  • Polkadot employs on-chain governance, allowing token holders to vote on proposals directly.

More about this Topic on Nextrope Blog

  1. What is Chainlink?
  2. NFT and Gaming: Chainlink Use Cases
  3. Chainlink in DeFi: Use Cases
  4. Chainlink vs. Avalanche: Exploring the Blockchain Frontier
  5. Authorization and Identity: Chainlink Use Cases
  6. Chainlink and On-Chain Finance Use Cases

Tagi

Most viewed


Never miss a story

Stay updated about Nextrope news as it happens.

You are subscribed

The Ultimate Web3 Backend Guide: Supercharge dApps with APIs

Tomasz Dybowski

04 Mar 2025
The Ultimate Web3 Backend Guide: Supercharge dApps with APIs

Introduction

Web3 backend development is essential for building scalable, efficient and decentralized applications (dApps) on EVM-compatible blockchains like Ethereum, Polygon, and Base. A robust Web3 backend enables off-chain computations, efficient data management and better security, ensuring seamless interaction between smart contracts, databases and frontend applications.

Unlike traditional Web2 applications that rely entirely on centralized servers, Web3 applications aim to minimize reliance on centralized entities. However, full decentralization isn't always possible or practical, especially when it comes to high-performance requirements, user authentication or storing large datasets. A well-structured backend in Web3 ensures that these limitations are addressed, allowing for a seamless user experience while maintaining decentralization where it matters most.

Furthermore, dApps require efficient backend solutions to handle real-time data processing, reduce latency, and provide smooth user interactions. Without a well-integrated backend, users may experience delays in transactions, inconsistencies in data retrieval, and inefficiencies in accessing decentralized services. Consequently, Web3 backend development is a crucial component in ensuring a balance between decentralization, security, and functionality.

This article explores:

  • When and why Web3 dApps need a backend
  • Why not all applications should be fully on-chain
  • Architecture examples of hybrid dApps
  • A comparison between APIs and blockchain-based logic

This post kicks off a Web3 backend development series, where we focus on the technical aspects of implementing Web3 backend solutions for decentralized applications.

Why Do Some Web3 Projects Need a Backend?

Web3 applications seek to achieve decentralization, but real-world constraints often necessitate hybrid architectures that include both on-chain and off-chain components. While decentralized smart contracts provide trustless execution, they come with significant limitations, such as high gas fees, slow transaction finality, and the inability to store large amounts of data. A backend helps address these challenges by handling logic and data management more efficiently while still ensuring that core transactions remain secure and verifiable on-chain.

Moreover, Web3 applications must consider user experience. Fully decentralized applications often struggle with slow transaction speeds, which can negatively impact usability. A hybrid backend allows for pre-processing operations off-chain while committing final results to the blockchain. This ensures that users experience fast and responsive interactions without compromising security and transparency.

While decentralization is a core principle of blockchain technology, many dApps still rely on a Web2-style backend for practical reasons:

1. Performance & Scalability in Web3 Backend Development

  • Smart contracts are expensive to execute and require gas fees for every interaction.
  • Offloading non-essential computations to a backend reduces costs and improves performance.
  • Caching and load balancing mechanisms in traditional backends ensure smooth dApp performance and improve response times for dApp users.
  • Event-driven architectures using tools like Redis or Kafka can help manage asynchronous data processing efficiently.

2. Web3 APIs for Data Storage and Off-Chain Access

  • Storing large amounts of data on-chain is impractical due to high costs.
  • APIs allow dApps to store & fetch off-chain data (e.g. user profiles, transaction history).
  • Decentralized storage solutions like IPFS, Arweave and Filecoin can be used for storing immutable data (e.g. NFT metadata), but a Web2 backend helps with indexing and querying structured data efficiently.

3. Advanced Logic & Data Aggregation in Web3 Backend

  • Some dApps need complex business logic that is inefficient or impossible to implement in a smart contract.
  • Backend APIs allow for data aggregation from multiple sources, including oracles (e.g. Chainlink) and off-chain databases.
  • Middleware solutions like The Graph help in indexing blockchain data efficiently, reducing the need for on-chain computation.

4. User Authentication & Role Management in Web3 dApps

  • Many applications require user logins, permissions or KYC compliance.
  • Blockchain does not natively support session-based authentication, requiring a backend for handling this logic.
  • Tools like Firebase Auth, Auth0 or Web3Auth can be used to integrate seamless authentication for Web3 applications.

5. Cost Optimization with Web3 APIs

  • Every change in a smart contract requires a new audit, costing tens of thousands of dollars.
  • By handling logic off-chain where possible, projects can minimize expensive redeployments.
  • Using layer 2 solutions like Optimism, Arbitrum and zkSync can significantly reduce gas costs.

Web3 Backend Development: Tools and Technologies

A modern Web3 backend integrates multiple tools to handle smart contract interactions, data storage, and security. Understanding these tools is crucial to developing a scalable and efficient backend for dApps. Without the right stack, developers may face inefficiencies, security risks, and scaling challenges that limit the adoption of their Web3 applications.

Unlike traditional backend development, Web3 requires additional considerations, such as decentralized authentication, smart contract integration, and secure data management across both on-chain and off-chain environments.

Here’s an overview of the essential Web3 backend tech stack:

1. API Development for Web3 Backend Services

  • Node.js is the go-to backend runtime good for Web3 applications due to its asynchronous event-driven architecture.
  • NestJS is a framework built on top of Node.js, providing modular architecture and TypeScript support for structured backend development.

2. Smart Contract Interaction Libraries for Web3 Backend

  • Ethers.js and Web3.js are TypeScript/JavaScript libraries used for interacting with Ethereum-compatible blockchains.

3. Database Solutions for Web3 Backend

  • PostgreSQL: Structured database used for storing off-chain transactional data.
  • MongoDB: NoSQL database for flexible schema data storage.
  • Firebase: A set of tools used, among other things, for user authentication.
  • The Graph: Decentralized indexing protocol used to query blockchain data efficiently.

4. Cloud Services and Hosting for Web3 APIs

When It Doesn't Make Sense to Go Fully On-Chain

Decentralization is valuable, but it comes at a cost. Fully on-chain applications suffer from performance limitations, high costs and slow execution speeds. For many use cases, a hybrid Web3 architecture that utilizes a mix of blockchain-based and off-chain components provides a more scalable and cost-effective solution.

In some cases, forcing full decentralization is unnecessary and inefficient. A hybrid Web3 architecture balances decentralization and practicality by allowing non-essential logic and data storage to be handled off-chain while maintaining trustless and verifiable interactions on-chain.

The key challenge when designing a hybrid Web3 backend is ensuring that off-chain computations remain auditable and transparent. This can be achieved through cryptographic proofs, hash commitments and off-chain data attestations that anchor trust into the blockchain while improving efficiency.

For example, Optimistic Rollups and ZK-Rollups allow computations to happen off-chain while only submitting finalized data to Ethereum, reducing fees and increasing throughput. Similarly, state channels enable fast, low-cost transactions that only require occasional settlement on-chain.

A well-balanced Web3 backend architecture ensures that critical dApp functionalities remain decentralized while offloading resource-intensive tasks to off-chain systems. This makes applications cheaper, faster and more user-friendly while still adhering to blockchain's principles of transparency and security.

Example: NFT-based Game with Off-Chain Logic

Imagine a Web3 game where users buy, trade and battle NFT-based characters. While asset ownership should be on-chain, other elements like:

  • Game logic (e.g., matchmaking, leaderboard calculations)
  • User profiles & stats
  • Off-chain notifications

can be handled off-chain to improve speed and cost-effectiveness.

Architecture Diagram

Below is an example diagram showing how a hybrid Web3 application splits responsibilities between backend and blockchain components.

Hybrid Web3 Architecture

Comparing Web3 Backend APIs vs. Blockchain-Based Logic

FeatureWeb3 Backend (API)Blockchain (Smart Contracts)
Change ManagementCan be updated easilyEvery change requires a new contract deployment
CostTraditional hosting feesHigh gas fees + costly audits
Data StorageCan store large datasetsLimited and expensive storage
SecuritySecure but relies on centralized infrastructureFully decentralized & trustless
PerformanceFast response timesLimited by blockchain throughput

Reducing Web3 Costs with AI Smart Contract Audit

One of the biggest pain points in Web3 development is the cost of smart contract audits. Each change to the contract code requires a new audit, often costing tens of thousands of dollars.

To address this issue, Nextrope is developing an AI-powered smart contract auditing tool, which:

  • Reduces audit costs by automating code analysis.
  • Speeds up development cycles by catching vulnerabilities early.
  • Improves security by providing quick feedback.

This AI-powered solution will be a game-changer for the industry, making smart contract development more cost-effective and accessible.

Conclusion

Web3 backend development plays a crucial role in scalable and efficient dApps. While full decentralization is ideal in some cases, many projects benefit from a hybrid architecture, where off-chain components optimize performance, reduce costs and improve user experience.

In future posts in this Web3 backend series, we’ll explore specific implementation details, including:

  • How to design a Web3 API for dApps
  • Best practices for integrating backend services
  • Security challenges and solutions

Stay tuned for the next article in this series!

Nextrope Launches “AI-Powered Smart Contract Auditing” Project

Miłosz Mach

03 Mar 2025
Nextrope Launches “AI-Powered Smart Contract Auditing” Project

Next Enterprises Sp. z o.o. is implementing a project co-financed by the European Funds, titled "Smart Contract Auditing with Artificial Intelligence". The goal of the project is to develop and deploy an advanced AI model that enables efficient analysis, vulnerability detection, and security auditing of smart contracts, taking into account their complexity and uniqueness.

Planned Project Tasks:

  • Development of an AI model trained on Solidity keywords;
  • Creation of an effective model in simulated conditions;
  • Analysis of the unpredictability of compiled code execution within the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) in the context of the developed model in a controlled environment;
  • Validation of the model in real-world conditions.

Target Groups:

  • Specialized audit firms focused on smart contract security;
  • Companies developing and/or deploying smart contracts on various platforms;
  • Exchanges, wallet providers, and decentralized applications (dApps) in the blockchain sector;
  • Government agencies or industry compliance bodies responsible for blockchain technology regulation;
  • Smart contract security specialists and developers.

The implementation of the developed tool will enable automated and efficient auditing of smart contracts. The model will provide detailed insights and recommendations for optimizing transaction costs and improving contract performance. As a result, users will be able to make informed decisions, enhancing security and operational efficiency within the blockchain ecosystem. Key benefits stem from the model’s training on smart contract code, audit data, and detected vulnerabilities. Additionally, the incorporation of chaos theory principles will allow for more precise risk and anomaly forecasting.

By deploying this advanced AI model, the project will enhance the security, efficiency, and accessibility of blockchain technology for end users. This will translate into tangible social and economic benefits, including:

  1. Economic Security
  2. Business and Financial Security
  3. Increased Public Trust
  4. Optimization of Transaction Costs
  5. Support for Innovation and Entrepreneurship
  6. Education and Public Awareness

Project Value: 4,173,953.24 PLN
European Funds Contribution: 3,090,156.39 PLN

#EUFunds #EuropeanFunds

Challenges in Smart Contract Auditing

Smart contracts have become a fundamental component of blockchain technology, eliminating intermediaries, and automating processes. However, their growing significance also introduces new challenges, particularly in ensuring security and compliance with industry standards.

Traditional smart contract audits rely heavily on manual code reviews, which are expensive, time-consuming, and prone to human error. As cyber threats continue to evolve, the use of advanced technologies to support the auditing process is imperative.

The Role of AI in Data Analysis

Artificial intelligence (AI) introduces a new paradigm in smart contract security assessment by leveraging its capability to process vast amounts of data and identify patterns that may go unnoticed with traditional auditing methods. AI enables:

  • Automated code analysis and real-time detection of potential vulnerabilities,
  • Optimization of auditing processes by reducing human errors and improving threat identification efficiency,
  • Better adaptation to evolving regulatory requirements and emerging threats within the blockchain ecosystem,
  • Rapid analysis of large datasets, allowing for quick insights and the detection of non-obvious dependencies in smart contract code.

By utilizing AI, the auditing process becomes more comprehensive, precise, and scalable, enabling continuous risk monitoring and adaptation to new attack vectors.

A New Era of Smart Contract Security with AI

With the support of European Funds under the European Funds for a Modern Economy (FENG) program, we are conducting research on next-generation blockchain auditing methods, reinforcing Nextrope’s position as a leader in innovative technology solutions.

The "Smart Contract Auditing with Artificial Intelligence (AI)" project contributes to key aspects of blockchain security by:

  • Automating smart contract audits, accelerating verification processes, and improving their accuracy,
  • Optimizing costs, making professional audits more accessible to a broader range of entities,
  • Raising security standards and enhancing regulatory compliance,
  • Increasing trust in smart contracts, fostering broader technology adoption.

Interested in learning more about our project or discovering how to utilize AI in your company? 📩 Contact us at contact@nextrope.com for further details!

Tagi