Polygon (Matic) – this is what the future of blockchain looks like!
Maciej Zieliński
26 Aug 2021
Polygon is setting new standards for scaling solutions. A protocol created to build and connect Ethereum-compatible networks shows what the future of blockchain could look like.
Polygon, formerly known as the Matic network, is one of the top-rated solutions using side-chains of the blockchain to provide faster and cheaper transactions on Ethereum. In many ways, it resembles other Layer 2 projects such as Avalanche and Cosmos, but according to its creators, it is much more efficient and secure. Practice seems to confirm this.
What challenges Polygon is responding to?
Ethereum is the most widely used blockchain protocol, but it has a number of limitations, including:
High transaction costs
Low throughput
Problematic UX
Many projects are now exploring the use of Ethereum-compatible blockchains as a way to mitigate these limitations while leveraging the benefits of the entire ecosystem. However, the market still lacks specialized frameworks to build such blockchains or a protocol to connect them. According to the developers of the Matic network, this causes fragmentation of ecosystems and brings with it serious development challenges.
Solutions
Polygon addresses these issues by implementing solutions such as:
One-click deployment of turnkey blockchain networks
A growing set of modules for creating custom networks
Adapter modules to enable interoperability of existing blockchain networks
Polygon basics
As a Layer 2 solution, Polygon addresses the diverse needs of developers by providing tools to create scalable dApps that prioritize security, modularity and UX. This is made possible through a protocol architecture consisting of Proof of Stake (PoS) Commit Chains and More Viable Plasma (MoreVP).
In a nutshell, the operation of the Matic network relies on Commit Chains, which are transaction networks that run on the main blockchain, Ethereum. Commit Chains combine transactions into batches, which are then confirmed in bulk before returning the data to Ethereum.
DeFi moves to Polygon
Even the drop in Ethereum gas fees is not stopping more users and developers of decentralized finance from migrating to Polygon. Thanks to the low transaction price and speed of creating more blocks, the number of DeFi projects choosing to use it is growing rapidly. Among them are already Aave and Sushi Swap.
"There are advantages to using Layer 2 solutions, especially Polygon, because with DeFi, if the transaction cost is very high, for small players and casual speculators, participation just doesn't make sense," Sameep Singhania, founder of the QuickSwap exchange based on the protocol, said in an interview with CoinDesk. "That's why I think it's a good move that DeFi is moving to Polygon.".
Polygon and Sushi Swap
How much the Matic network has grown in importance on the DeFi market is perfectly illustrated by the aforementioned Sushi Swap. According to DappRadar, the popular market maker in June this year had as many as 15 thousand registered wallets on Polygon and only a little over 4 thousand on Ethereum. This means that many more Sushi Swap users are currently on the Matic network than on Ethereum.
A similar relationship is observed on the decentralized exchange Aave, where the average daily transaction volume on Polygon oscillates around $6.75 million, significantly exceeding the $5 million on Ethereum. Coindesk reports that Aave began working with Polygon in March of this year to avoid the high transaction costs on Ethereum.
Token MATIC
The protocol has its own token - MATIC, whose value has managed to increase by 9000% for a year. It is currently the 15th cryptocurrency in terms of capitalization.
"Layer 2 solutions are a catalyst for growth and new users" said Mira Christanto, an analyst at Messari, a blockchain market research firm "Ethereum gas fees have been prohibitive for many users. Polygon and other Layer 2 solutions are precursors to demand for Ethereum once the gas fee hurdle is removed".
As the web3 field grows in complexity, traditional analytical tools often fall short in capturing the dynamics of digital markets. This is where Monte Carlo simulations come into play, offering a mathematical technique to model systems fraught with uncertainty.
Monte Carlo simulations employ random sampling to understand probable outcomes in processes that are too complex for straightforward analytic solutions. By simulating thousands, or even millions, of scenarios, Monte Carlo methods can provide insights into the likelihood of different outcomes, helping stakeholders make informed decisions under conditions of uncertainty.
In this article, we will explore the role of Monte Carlo simulations within the context of tokenomics. illustrating how they are employed to forecast market dynamics, assess risk, and optimize strategies in the volatile realm of cryptocurrencies. By integrating this powerful tool, businesses and investors can enhance their analytical capabilities, paving the way for more resilient and adaptable economic models in the digital age.
The Monte Carlo method is an approach to solving problems that involve random sampling to understand probable outcomes. This technique was first developed in the 1940s by scientists working on the atomic bomb during the Manhattan Project. The method was designed to simplify the complex simulations of neutron diffusion, but it has since evolved to address a broad spectrum of problems across various fields including finance, engineering, and research.
Random Sampling and Statistical Experimentation
At the heart of Monte Carlo simulations is the concept of random sampling from a probability distribution to compute results. This method does not seek a singular precise answer but rather a probability distribution of possible outcomes. By performing a large number of trials with random variables, these simulations mimic the real-life fluctuations and uncertainties inherent in complex systems.
Role of Randomness and Probability Distributions in Simulations
Monte Carlo simulations leverage the power of probability distributions to model potential scenarios in processes where exact outcomes cannot be determined due to uncertainty. Each simulation iteration uses randomly generated values that follow a specific statistical distribution to model different outcomes. This method allows analysts to quantify and visualize the probability of different scenarios occurring.
The strength of Monte Carlo simulations lies in the insight they offer into potential risks. They allow modelers to see into the probabilistic "what-if" scenarios that more closely mimic real-world conditions.
Monte Carlo Simulations in Tokenomics
Monte Carlo simulations are instrumental tool for token engineers. They're so useful due to their ability to model emergent behaviors. Here are some key areas where these simulations are applied:
Pricing and Valuation of Tokens
Determining the value of a new token can be challenging due to the volatile nature of cryptocurrency markets. Monte Carlo simulations help by modeling various market scenarios and price fluctuations over time, allowing analysts to estimate a token's potential future value under different conditions.
Assessing Market Dynamics and Investor Behavior
Cryptocurrency markets are influenced by a myriad of factors including regulatory changes, technological advancements, and shifts in investor sentiment. Monte Carlo methods allow researchers to simulate these variables in an integrated environment to see how they might impact token economics, from overall market cap fluctuations to liquidity concerns.
Assesing Possible Risks
By running a large number of simulations it’s possible to stress-test the project in multiple scenarios and identify emergent risks. This is perhaps the most important function of Monte Carlo Process, since these risks can’t be assessed any other way.
Benefits of Using Monte Carlo Simulations
By generating a range of possible outcomes and their probabilities, Monte Carlo simulations help decision-makers in the cryptocurrency space anticipate potential futures and make informed strategic choices. This capability is invaluable for planning token launches, managing supply mechanisms, and designing marketing strategies to optimize market penetration.
Using Monte Carlo simulations, stakeholders in the tokenomics field can not only understand and mitigate risks but also explore the potential impact of different strategic decisions. This predictive power supports more robust economic models and can lead to more stable and successful token launches.
Implementing Monte Carlo Simulations
Several tools and software packages can facilitate the implementation of Monte Carlo simulations in tokenomics. One of the most notable is cadCAD, a Python library that provides a flexible and powerful environment for simulating complex systems.
Overview of cadCAD configuration Components
To better understand how Monte Carlo simulations work in practice, let’s take a look at the cadCAD code snippet:
sim_config = {
'T': range(200), # number of timesteps
'N': 3, # number of Monte Carlo runs
'M': params # model parameters
}
Explanation of Simulation Configuration Components
T: Number of Time Steps
Definition: The 'T' parameter in CadCAD configurations specifies the number of time steps the simulation should execute. Each time step represents one iteration of the model, during which the system is updated. That update is based on various rules defined by token engineers in other parts of the code. For example: we might assume that one iteration = one day, and define data-based functions that predict token demand on that day.
N: Number of Monte Carlo Runs
Definition: The 'N' parameter sets the number of Monte Carlo runs. Each run represents a complete execution of the simulation from start to finish, using potentially different random seeds for each run. This is essential for capturing variability and understanding the distribution of possible outcomes. For example, we can acknowledge that token’s price will be correlated with the broad cryptocurrency market, which acts somewhat unpredictably.
M: Model Parameters
Definition: The 'M' key contains the model parameters, which are variables that influence system's behavior but do not change dynamically with each time step. These parameters can be constants or distributions that are used within the policy and update functions to model the external and internal factors affecting the system.
Importance of These Components
Together, these components define the skeleton of your Monte Carlo simulation in CadCAD. The combination of multiple time steps and Monte Carlo runs allows for a comprehensive exploration of the stochastic nature of the modeled system. By varying the number of timesteps (T) and runs (N), you can adjust the depth and breadth of the exploration, respectively. The parameters (M) provide the necessary context and ensure that each simulation is realistic.
Conclusion
Monte Carlo simulations represent a powerful analytical tool in the arsenal of token engineers. By leveraging the principles of statistics, these simulations provide deep insights into the complex dynamics of token-based systems. This method allows for a nuanced understanding of potential future scenarios and helps with making informed decisions.
We encourage all stakeholders in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space to consider implementing Monte Carlo simulations. The insights gained from such analytical techniques can lead to more effective and resilient economic models, paving the way for the sustainable growth and success of digital currencies.
If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.
FAQ
What is a Monte Carlo simulation in tokenomics context?
It's a mathematical method that uses random sampling to predict uncertain outcomes.
What are the benefits of using Monte Carlo simulations in tokenomics?
These simulations help foresee potential market scenarios, aiding in strategic planning and risk management for token launches.
Why are Monte Carlo simulations unique in cryptocurrency analysis?
They provide probabilistic outcomes rather than fixed predictions, effectively simulating real-world market variability and risk.
Behavioral economics is a field that explores the effects of psychological factors on economic decision-making. This branch of study is especially pertinent while designing a token since user perception can significantly impact a token's adoption.
We will delve into how token design choices, such as staking yields, token inflation, and lock-up periods, influence consumer behavior. Research studies reveal that the most significant factor for a token's attractiveness isn’t its functionality, but its past price performance. This underscores the impact of speculative factors. Tokens that have shown previous price increases are preferred over those with more beneficial economic features.
The design of a cryptocurrency token can significantly influence user behavior by leveraging common cognitive biases and decision-making processes. For instance, the concept of "scarcity" can create a perceived value increase, prompting users to buy or hold a token in anticipation of future gains. Similarly, "loss aversion," a foundational principle of behavioral economics, suggests that the pain of losing is psychologically more impactful than the pleasure of an equivalent gain. In token design, mechanisms that minimize perceived losses (e.g. anti-dumping measures) can encourage long-term holding.
Incentives and Rewards
Behavioral economics also provides insight into how incentives can be structured to maximize user participation. Cryptocurrencies often use tokens as a form of reward for various behaviors, including mining, staking, or participating in governance through voting. The way these rewards are framed and distributed can greatly affect their effectiveness. For example, offering tokens as rewards for achieving certain milestones can tap into the 'endowment effect,' where people ascribe more value to things simply because they own them.
Social Proof and Network Effects
Social proof, where individuals copy the behavior of others, plays a crucial role in the adoption of tokens. Tokens that are seen being used and promoted by influential figures within the community can quickly gain traction, as new users emulate successful investors. The network effect further amplifies this, where the value of a token increases as more people start using it. This can be seen in the rapid growth of tokens like Ethereum, where the broad adoption of its smart contract functionality created a snowball effect, attracting even more developers and users.
Token Utility and Behavioral Levers
The utility of a token—what it can be used for—is also crucial. Tokens designed to offer real-world applications beyond mere financial speculation can provide more stable value retention. Integrating behavioral economics into utility design involves creating tokens that not only serve practical purposes but also resonate on an emotional level with users, encouraging engagement and investment. For example, tokens that offer governance rights might appeal to users' desire for control and influence within a platform, encouraging them to hold rather than sell.
Understanding Behavioral Tokenomics
Intersection of Behavioral Economics and Tokenomics
Behavioral economics examines how psychological influences, various biases, and the way in which information is framed affect individual decisions. In tokenomics, these factors can significantly impact the success or failure of a cryptocurrency by influencing user behavior towards investment
Influence of Psychological Factors on Token Attraction
A recent study observed that the attractiveness of a token often hinges more on its historical price performance than on intrinsic benefits like yield returns or innovative economic models. This emphasizes the fact that the cryptocurrency sector is still young, and therefore subject to speculative behaviors.
The Effect of Presentation and Context
Another interesting finding from the study is the impact of how tokens are presented. In scenarios where tokens are evaluated separately, the influence of their economic attributes on consumer decisions is minimal. However, when tokens are assessed side by side, these attributes become significantly more persuasive. This highlights the importance of context in economic decision-making—a core principle of behavioral economics. It’s easy to translate this into real-life example - just think about the concept of staking yields. When told that the yield on e.g. Cardano is 5% you might not think much of it. But, if you were simultaneously told that Anchor’s yield is 19%, then that 5% seems like a tragic deal.
Implications for Token Designers
The application of behavioral economics to the design of cryptocurrency tokens involves leveraging human psychology to encourage desired behaviors. Here are several core principles of behavioral economics and how they can be effectively utilized in token design:
Leveraging Price Performance
Studies show clearly: “price going up” tends to attract users more than most other token attributes. This finding implies that token designers need to focus on strategies that can showcase their economic effects in the form of price increases. This means that e.g. it would be more beneficial to conduct a buy-back program than to conduct an airdrop.
Scarcity and Perceived Value
Scarcity triggers a sense of urgency and increases perceived value. Cryptocurrency tokens can be designed to have a limited supply, mimicking the scarcity of resources like gold. This not only boosts the perceived rarity and value of the tokens but also drives demand due to the "fear of missing out" (FOMO). By setting a cap on the total number of tokens, developers can create a natural scarcity that may encourage early adoption and long-term holding.
Initial Supply Considerations
The initial supply represents the number of tokens that are available in circulation immediately following the token's launch. The chosen number can influence early market perceptions. For instance, a large initial supply might suggest a lower value per token, which could attract speculators. Data shows that tokens with low nominal value are highly volatile and generally underperform. Understanding how the initial supply can influence investor behavior is important for ensuring the token's stability.
Managing Maximum Supply and Inflation
A finite maximum supply can safeguard the token against inflation, potentially enhancing its value by ensuring scarcity. On the other hand, the inflation rate, which defines the pace at which new tokens are introduced, influences the token's value and user trust.
Investors in cryptocurrency markets show a notable aversion to deflationary tokenomics. Participants are less likely to invest in tokens with a deflationary framework, viewing them as riskier and potentially less profitable. Research suggests that while moderate inflation can be perceived neutrally or even positively, high inflation does not enhance attractiveness, and deflation is distinctly unfavorable.
These findings suggest that token designers should avoid high deflation rates, which could deter investment and user engagement. Instead, a balanced approach to inflation, avoiding extremes, appears to be preferred among cryptocurrency investors.
Loss Aversion
People tend to prefer avoiding losses to acquiring equivalent gains; this is known as loss aversion. In token design, this can be leveraged by introducing mechanisms that protect against losses, such as staking rewards that offer consistent returns or features that minimize price volatility. Additionally, creating tokens that users can "earn" through participation or contribution to the network can tap into this principle by making users feel they are safeguarding an investment or adding protective layers to their holdings.
Social Proof
Social proof is a powerful motivator in user adoption and engagement. When potential users see others adopting a token, especially influential figures or peers, they are more likely to perceive it as valuable and trustworthy. Integrating social proof into token marketing strategies, such as showcasing high-profile endorsements or community support, can significantly enhance user acquisition and retention.
Mental Accounting
Mental accounting involves how people categorize and treat money differently depending on its source or intended use. Tokens can be designed to encourage specific spending behaviors by being categorized for certain types of transactions—like tokens that are specifically for governance, others for staking, and others still for transaction fees. By distinguishing tokens in this way, users can more easily rationalize holding or spending them based on their designated purposes.
Endowment Effect
The endowment effect occurs when people value something more highly simply because they own it. For tokenomics, creating opportunities for users to feel ownership can increase attachment and perceived value. This can be done through mechanisms that reward users with tokens for participation or contribution, thus making them more reluctant to part with their holdings because they value them more highly.
Conclusion
By considering how behavioral factors influence market perception, token engineers can create much more effective ecosystems. Ensuring high demand for the token, means ensuring proper funding for the project in general.
If you're looking to create a robust tokenomics model and go through institutional-grade testing please reach out to contact@nextrope.com. Our team is ready to help you with the token engineering process and ensure your project’s resilience in the long term.
FAQ
How does the initial supply of a token influence its market perception?
The initial supply sets the perceived value of a token; a larger supply might suggest a lower per-token value.
Why is the maximum supply important in token design?
A finite maximum supply signals scarcity, helping protect against inflation and enhance long-term value.
How do investors perceive inflation and deflation in cryptocurrencies?
Investors generally dislike deflationary tokens and view them as risky. Moderate inflation is seen neutrally or positively, while high inflation is not favored.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.